Falcon Rappaport & Berkman PLLC v. Metaverse Law Corporation
Falcon Rappaport & Berkman PLLC |
Metaverse Law Corporation |
1:2021cv07905 |
September 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
J Paul Oetken |
Trademark |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 tr |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER: THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AT #4 IS DISSOLVED. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge J. Paul Oetken) (Text Only Order) (Oetken, J.) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: #4 Order to Show Cause,,. Document filed by Falcon Rappaport & Berkman PLLC..(Peltz, Moish) |
Filing 9 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Falcon Rappaport & Berkman PLLC..(Peltz, Moish) |
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Metaverse Law Corporation..(pc) |
Filing 7 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to METAVERSE LAW CORPORTATION, re: #5 Complaint. Document filed by Falcon Rappaport & Berkman PLLC..(Peltz, Moish) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT TRADEMARK FORM. Notice to Attorney Moish Eli Peltz to RE-FILE re: Document No. #6 AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark - Notice of Submission by Attorney. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the AO 120 Patent/Trademark form is not correct; the Date Filed field on the AO 120 Patent/Trademark form is incorrect. Re-file the document using the event type AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark - Notice of Submission by Attorney found under the event list Other Documents and attach the correct AO 120 Patent/Trademark PDF form Do not re-file the form. The Court has corrected the deficiency/deficiencies.. (sj) |
Filing 6 FILING ERROR - PDF ERROR AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review..(Peltz, Moish) Modified on 9/24/2021 (sj). |
Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Metaverse Law Corporation. Document filed by Falcon Rappaport & Berkman PLLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Email Thread, #2 Exhibit 2 - Cease and Desist Letter).(Peltz, Moish) |
Filing 4 ORDER: Plaintiff alleges that venue is proper because Defendant "threatened a trademark infringement claim against a business in the State of New York and this District by sending a cease and desist letter to [Plaintiff] in the State of New York." (Dkt. No. 1 at 2). But the cease- and-desist letter, attached to the Complaint as an exhibit, is addressed to Plaintiff's office in Rockville Centre (Dkt. No 1, Exhibit 2), which is located within the Eastern District of New York. Plaintiff is therefore directed to show cause within twenty-one days as to why the Court should not, sua sponte, transfer the case to the Eastern District of New York. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 9/23/2021) (js) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT TRADEMARK FORM. Notice to Attorney Moish Eli Peltz to RE-FILE re: Document No. #3 AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark - Notice of Submission by Attorney. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the Patent or Trademark Number field section on the AO 120 Patent/Trademark reflects an error in Trademark No. provided on form that does not correspond to pleading. Re-file the document using the event type AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark - Notice of Submission by Attorney found under the event list Other Documents and attach the correct AO 120 Patent/Trademark PDF form. (vf) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Moish Eli Peltz to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the wrong party/parties whom the pleading is against were selected. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (vf) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Moish Eli Peltz. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Falcon Rappaport & Berkman PLLC, Metaverse Law Corporation. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted. (vf) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge J. Paul Oetken. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
Filing 3 AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review..(Peltz, Moish) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Peltz, Moish) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Falcon Rappaport & Berkman PLLC. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25094466)Document filed by Falcon Rappaport & Berkman PLLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Email Thread, #2 Exhibit 2 - Cease and Desist Letter).(Peltz, Moish) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Falcon Rappaport & Berkman PLLC v. Metaverse Law Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Falcon Rappaport & Berkman PLLC | |
Represented By: | Moish Eli Peltz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Metaverse Law Corporation | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.