Bowens v. Russell et al
Russell Bowens |
Keith Russell and New York Theological Seminary |
1:2021cv08136 |
September 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Laura Taylor Swain |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Re-mailed a copy of #4 Order 60 Days Amended Complaint (case opening) to Russell Bowens at 875 Pennsylvania Ave., Apt. 3H, Brooklyn, NY 11207. (kh) |
Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk. Transmitted re: #4 Order 60 Days Amended Complaint (case opening), to the Docket Assistant Clerk for case processing..(rdz) |
Received returned mail re: #4 Order 60 Days Amended Complaint (case opening). Mail was addressed to Russell Bowens, 875 Pennsylvania Ave., Brooklyn, NY 11207 and was returned for the following reason(s): Return To Sender REFUSED Unable To Forward. (vn) |
![]() |
Mailed a copy of #4 Order 60 Days Amended Complaint (case opening) to Russell Bowens at 875 Pennsylvania Ave., Brooklyn, NY 11207. (kh) |
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(wb) |
![]() |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against New York Theological Seminary, Keith Russell. Document filed by Russell Bowens.(rdz) |
Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Russell Bowens.(rdz) |
Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.