Slade v. Something Navy, Inc.
| Linda Slade |
| Something Navy, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv08196 |
| October 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Lorna G Schofield |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties, plaintiff Linda Slade and defendant Something Navy, Inc. (collectively, the "Parties" and individually a "Party"), that, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and pursuant to a settlement agreement that shall be judicially enforceable, all of the claims that were asserted or that could have been asserted in the above-captioned action are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to any Party as against the other. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that counsel for the Parties have been authorized by their respective clients to execute this Stipulation. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that no Party hereto is an infant or incompetent person for whom a committee or conservator has been appointed. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that facsimile/photocopy signatures may be accepted as originals for all purposes, including filing with the Court. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this Stipulation may be filed, without further notice, with the Clerk of the Court by any Party herein. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 1/18/2022) (jca)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Something Navy, Inc. and without costs pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Linda Slade. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Shaked, Dan) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER: The Court has been informed that the parties have reached a settlement in principle in this case. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is dismissed without costs and without prejudice to restoring the action to the Court's calendar, provided the application to restore the action is made within forty-five (45) days of this Order. Any application to reopen filed after forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order may be denied solely on that basis. Any pending motions are DENIED as moot, and all conferences and deadlines are CANCELLED. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 12/3/2021) (va)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Settlement . Document filed by Linda Slade..(Shaked, Dan) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #7 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiffs Complaint addressed to Judge Lorna G. Schofield from Matthew F. Damm dated November 2, 2021. Application GRANTED. By December 13, 2021, Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint.. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 11/3/2021) (kv)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Something Navy, Inc. answer due 12/13/2021. (kv) |
| Filing 7 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiffs Complaint addressed to Judge Lorna G. Schofield from Matthew F. Damm dated November 2, 2021. Document filed by Something Navy, Inc...(Damm, Matthew) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Matthew Damm on behalf of Something Navy, Inc...(Damm, Matthew) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: This case has been assigned to me for all purposes. It is hereby ORDERED that a telephonic conference will be held on December 9, 2021 at 10:40 a.m. The parties shall call (888) 363-4749 and enter the access code: 558-3333. The telephonic conference is public, and the time of the conference is approximate, but the parties shall be ready to proceed by that time. All pretrial conferences must be attended by the attorney who will serve as principal trial counsel. The parties shall ensure they are all dialed into the conference call by the appointed conference time. Counsel who have noticed an appearance as of the issuance of this order are directed (i) to notify all other parties' attorneys in this action by serving upon each of them a copy of this order and the Court's Individual Rules forthwith, and (ii) to file proof of such notice with the Court. If unaware of the identity of counsel for any of the parties, counsel receiving this order must send a copy of this order and Individual Rules to that party personally. IPTC MATERIALS DUE: December 2, 2021 at noon. Initial Conference set for 12/9/2021 at 10:40 AM before Judge Lorna G. Schofield. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 10/18/2021) (ama)
|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Something Navy, Inc. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Dan Shaked. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code Westchester. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to Bronx. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Lorna G. Schofield. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Something Navy, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Linda Slade..(Shaked, Dan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Shaked, Dan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Something Navy, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25150096)Document filed by Linda Slade..(Shaked, Dan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Slade v. Something Navy, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Linda Slade | |
| Represented By: | Dan Shaked |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Something Navy, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Damm |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
