Lin v. Mayorkas et al
Dan Lin |
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Alejandro Mayorkas |
1:2021cv08212 |
October 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
John P Cronan |
Other Immigration Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, that this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs or fees to any party pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 11/16/2021) (jca) |
Filing 7 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas..(Byars, Michael) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael James Byars on behalf of Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas..(Byars, Michael) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED UNEXECUTED as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou. Attempted Service of Summons and Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. Service was attempted on 10/8/2021. Document filed by Dan Lin..(Rodkin, David) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED UNEXECUTED as to Alejandro Mayorkas. Attempted Service of Summons and Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. Service was attempted on 10/8/2021. Document filed by Dan Lin..(Rodkin, David) |
Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Dan Lin..(Rodkin, David) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Rodkin, David) |
Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to Attorney David Rodkin. Attorney must electronically file the Civil Cover Sheet. Use the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents. (sj) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney David Rodkin. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Dan Lin; Alejandro Mayorkas; Ur M. Jaddou. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party role was entered incorrectly; party text was omitted. (sj) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney David Rodkin. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code Albany. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to New York. (sj) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge John P. Cronan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj) |
Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25152570).Document filed by Dan Lin..(Rodkin, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.