Araman v. Real Estate Board of New York et al
| Christine M. Araman |
| Real Estate Board of New York, 237 W. 105th Street LLC, Real Broker LLC, Alex Araman, Beverly Araman, Paul Araman, Shirley Cabrera, Dr. Sergei Kalsow, Charlie Sahadi, Jonathan Gardner, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Nina Carlow, Esq., Aaron Levy, Mathew Levy, Anna Araman and Barry Janay |
| 1:2021cv08397 |
| October 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Ronnie Abrams |
| Anti-Trust |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 at |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 32 LETTER addressed to Judge Ronnie Abrams from C. Araman, dated 12/10/21 re: "RESPONSE TO ORDER DATED 11/23/21" -Please construe my 11/19/21 submission as a Reconsideration Motion under Local Civil Rule 6.3 and set forth the basis for the Court's jurisdiction under either 28:1331 or 28:1332 etc. Document filed by Christine M. Araman.(sc) |
Filing 31
ORDER re: #29 Response filed by Christine M. Araman. By no later than December 14, 2021, Plaintiff shall file a letter with the Court clarifying whether the Court should construe her November 19 submission as (1) an appeal of the Court's Order or (2) a motion for reconsideration of the Court's Order under Local Civil Rule 6.3. If Plaintiff's November 19 submission is a reconsideration motion, Plaintiff's December 14 letter shall set forth the basis for the Court's jurisdiction under either 28 U.S.C. 1331 or 28 U.S.C. 1332. Plaintiff has consented to electronic service of court documents. Dkt. 2. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 11/23/2021) (kv)
|
| Filing 30 LETTER from C. Araman, dated 11/22/21 re: "SERVICE BY CERTIFICATE OF MAILING"- The attached serves the purpose of mailing defendants by Certificate of Mailing on 11/22/21, and by email on 11/19/21 etc. Document filed by Christine M. Araman.(sc) |
|
Filing 29
RESPONSE TO ORDER OF DISMISSAL BY JUDGE ROBBIE ABRAMS, re: #23 Order of Dismissal. Document filed by Christine M. Araman. (sc)
|
|
Filing 28
MEMO ENDORSEMENT denying as moot #24 Motion to Dismiss. ENDORSEMENT: On November 9, 2021, the Court dismissed this action in full. Dkt. 23. Accordingly, Defendant Janay's motion to dismiss is hereby denied as moot. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 11/18/2021) (vfr)
|
| Filing 27 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Motion to Dismiss served on Christine Araman on 11/17/2021. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Barry Janay(c/o Rick Steiner Fell & Benowitz LLP), Barry Janay(c/o The Law Office of Barry E. Janay P.C.)..(Janay, Barry) |
| Filing 26 DECLARATION of Barry E. Janay, Esq. in Support re: #24 MOTION to Dismiss .. Document filed by Barry Janay(c/o Rick Steiner Fell & Benowitz LLP), Barry Janay(c/o The Law Office of Barry E. Janay P.C.)..(Janay, Barry) |
| Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #24 MOTION to Dismiss . . Document filed by Barry Janay(c/o Rick Steiner Fell & Benowitz LLP), Barry Janay(c/o The Law Office of Barry E. Janay P.C.)..(Janay, Barry) |
| Filing 24 MOTION to Dismiss . Document filed by Barry Janay(c/o Rick Steiner Fell & Benowitz LLP), Barry Janay(c/o The Law Office of Barry E. Janay P.C.)..(Janay, Barry) |
|
Filing 23
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: For the reasons stated above, the Court dismisses this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and as frivolous. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Plaintiff has consented to electronic service of court documents. (ECF 2.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 11/9/2021) (ate)
|
| Filing 22 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by William George Morris on behalf of Sergei Kalsow..(Morris, William) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael P. Canty on behalf of Jonathan Gardner..(Canty, Michael) |
| Filing 20 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint, served. Aaron Levy, served on 10/26/2021, answer due 11/16/2021. Service was accepted by Matthew Levy, co-tenant. Document filed by Christine M. Araman. (sc) |
| Filing 19 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint, served. Mathew Levy, served on 10/26/2021, answer due 11/16/2021. Service was accepted by Matthew Levy. Document filed by Christine M. Araman. (sc) |
| Filing 18 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint, served. Charlie Sahadi c/o Sahadi's, served on 10/21/2021, answer due 11/12/2021. Service was accepted by Mike Whelan, Co-worker. Document filed by Christine M. Araman. (sc) |
| Filing 17 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint, served. Alex Araman, served on 10/19/2021, answer due 11/9/2021. Service was accepted by J. Lozada, Doorman. Document filed by Christine M. Araman. (sc) |
| Filing 16 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint, served. 237 W. 105th Street LLC, c/o Fred L. Selman, Esq., served on 10/19/2021, answer due 11/9/2021. Service was accepted by Curtis Selman. Document filed by Christine M. Araman. (sc) |
| Filing 15 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint, served. Real Broker LLC, served on 10/19/2021, answer due 11/9/2021. Service was accepted by Hamilton Beck. Document filed by Christine M. Araman. (sc) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint, served. Barry Janay(c/o Rick Steiner Fell & Benowitz LLP), served on 10/19/2021, answer due 11/9/2021. Service was accepted by Julie Wong, co-worker. Document filed by Christine M. Araman. (sc) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint, served. Shirley Cabrera c/o Madnani Facial Plastics served on 10/19/2021, answer due 11/9/2021. Service was accepted by Shayla F.(last name refused), co-worker. Document filed by Christine M. Araman. (sc) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint, served. Real Estate Board of New York, served on 10/18/2021, answer due 11/8/2021. Service was accepted by Grace Boak. Document filed by Christine M. Araman. (sc) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint, served. Beverly Araman c/o Alex Araman served on 10/19/2021, answer due 11/9/2021. Service was accepted by J. Lozada, Doorman. Document filed by Christine M. Araman. (sc) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Anna Araman c/o Octoly, served on 10/19/2021, answer due 11/9/2021. Service was accepted by Anil Taneja. Document filed by Christine M. Araman. (sc) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint, served. Federal Bureau of Investigation, served on 10/28/2021, answer due 11/18/2021. Service was accepted by ADC - Spencer Lucas, FBI, NYC. Document filed by Christine M. Araman. (sc) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED, Summons and Complaint, served. Jonathan Gardner, served on 10/19/2021, answer due 11/9/2021. Service was accepted by Richard Lopez, co-worker at Labaton Surbaca LLP. Document filed by Christine M. Araman. (sc) Modified on 11/5/2021 (sc). |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint, served. Dr. Sergei Kalsow, served on 10/19/2021, answer due 11/9/2021. Service was accepted by Seara " Doe"(last name refused), co-worker. Document filed by Christine M. Araman. (sc) Modified on 11/5/2021 (sc). |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint, served. Paul Araman served on 10/19/2021, answer due 11/9/2021. Service was accepted by J. Lozada, Doorman. Document filed by Christine M. Araman. (sc) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint, served. Nina Carlow, Esq., served on 10/19/2021, answer due 11/9/2021. Service was accepted by Evan Thomas, co-worker. Document filed by Christine M. Araman. (sc) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to 237 W. 105th Street LLC, Alex Araman, Anna Araman, Beverly Araman, Paul Araman, Shirley Cabrera, Nina Carlow, Esq, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Jonathan Gardner, Barry Janay(c/o Rick Steiner Fell & Benowitz LLP), Barry Janay(c/o The Law Office of Barry E. Janay P.C.), Sergei Kalsow, Aaron Levy, Mathew Levy, Real Broker LLC, Real Estate Board of New York, Charlie Sahadi. Issued on 10/13/21. (kh) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Permission for Christine M. Araman to participate in electronic case filing in this case. Document filed by Christine M. Araman. (sac) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Christine M. Araman consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Christine M. Araman. (sac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 237 W. 105th Street LLC, Alex Araman, Anna Araman(c/o Octoly), Anna Araman, Beverly Araman, Paul Araman, Shirley Cabrera, Nina Carlow, Esq, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Jonathan Gardner, Barry Janay(c/o Rick Steiner Fell & Benowitz LLP), Barry Janay(c/o The Law Office of Barry E. Janay P.C.), Sergei Kalsow, Aaron Levy, Mathew Levy, Real Broker LLC, Real Estate Board of New York, Charlie Sahadi. (Filing Fee $402.00, Receipt Number 465401287349) Document filed by Christine M. Araman. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
| Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
