Li v. Garland et al
Su Yu Li |
Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas and Director U.S.C.I.S Ur M. Jaddou |
Ur M. Jaddou |
1:2021cv08411 |
October 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Alvin K Hellerstein |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. § 1361 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael James Byars on behalf of Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas..(Byars, Michael) |
Filing 12 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Ur M. Jaddou. (vf) |
Filing 11 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Alejandro Mayorkas. (vf) |
Filing 10 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Merrick Garland. (vf) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
Filing 9 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Ur M. Jaddou, re: #6 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. Document filed by Su Yu Li..(Kuzmin, Vlad) |
Filing 8 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Alejandro Mayorkas, re: #6 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. Document filed by Su Yu Li..(Kuzmin, Vlad) |
Filing 7 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Merrick Garland, re: #6 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. Document filed by Su Yu Li..(Kuzmin, Vlad) |
Filing 6 COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas.Document filed by Su Yu Li..(Kuzmin, Vlad) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Vlad Anatole Kuzmin. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Cause of Action code 05:706(a) Writ of Mandamus; County code New York. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Cause of Action code has been modified to 28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus; the County code has been modified to XX Out of State. (vf) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Vlad Anatole Kuzmin to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the pleading is not correct. The pleading title does not correspond to Complaint/Petition event type selected in ECF. When prompted indicate if document is a Complaint or Petition as it corresponds to your PDF title; and the All Defendant radio button was selected. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. If the deficiency/deficiencies are not corrected within five (5) days per Amended Standing Order 15-mc-00131 this case will be administratively closed. Initial Pleading due by 10/18/2021. (vf) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Vlad Anatole Kuzmin. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Su Yu Li, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur. M. Jaddou. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party role was entered incorrectly; party text was omitted. (vf) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Vlad Anatole Kuzmin to RE-FILE Document No. #2 Request for Issuance of Summons, #4 Request for Issuance of Summons, #3 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Summons Caption Party Name Error. Party names must correspond to pleading caption.The summons requested was not processed due to the deficient pleading. Please file your request for summons when you correct and refile your pleading. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. |
Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Kuzmin, Vlad) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Ur M. Jaddou, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. Document filed by Su Yu Li..(Kuzmin, Vlad) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Alejandro Mayorkas, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. Document filed by Su Yu Li..(Kuzmin, Vlad) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Merrick Garland, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. Document filed by Su Yu Li..(Kuzmin, Vlad) |
Filing 1 PETITION IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against All Defendants (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25183587).Document filed by Su Yu Li..(Kuzmin, Vlad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.