Price v. de Blasio et al
| Kelly Price |
| Mayor Bill de Blasio, The City of New York, Governor Kathy Hochul, The State of New York, Vincent Schiraldi, The New York City Department of Correction, Anthony J. Annucci and The New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision |
| 1:2021cv08540 |
| October 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 INTERNET CITATION NOTE: Material from decision with Internet citation re: #8 Order of Dismissal. (sjo) |
Filing 9
CIVIL JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the complaint is dismissed without prejudice The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. Plaintiff has consented to electronic service. (ECF 2.) (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 10/26/2021) (Attachments: #1 Pro Se Appeal Package) (sac)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: This action, filed IFP under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1), is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is denied and all other pending matters are terminated. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Plaintiff has consented to electronic service. (ECF 2.). (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 10/26/2021) (sac)
|
| Filing 7 FIRST MOTION for Reconsideration . Document filed by Kelly Price. Return Date set for 10/21/2021 at 12:00 PM..(, ) |
| Filing 6 MOTION FOR PERMISSION FOR ELECTRONIC CASE FILING, re: for Permission for Kelly Price to participate in electronic case filing in this case. Document filed by Kelly Price.(sc) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff's request for a temporary restraining order is denied. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). Plaintiff consents to electronic service. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 10/20/2021) (sac)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 10/20/2021) (vn) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Filing 3 APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS. Document filed by Kelly Price.(sc) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(wb) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Kelly Price consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Kelly Price. (sac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Anthony J. Annucci, Kathy Hochul, Vincent Schiraldi, The City of New York, The New York City Department of Correction, The New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, The State of New York, Bill de Blasio. Document filed by Kelly Price. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
