Rodriguez Ramos v. Jay Global Enterprises, Inc. et al
YELSOM RAMOS and Yelsom Emanuel Rodriguez Ramos |
Jay Global Enterprises, Inc., Gurum Corporation, Kyung H Jung and Gurum Corporation doing business as Jay Global Enterprises |
1:2021cv08617 |
October 20, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
John P Cronan |
Labor: Fair Standards |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Gennadiy Naydenskiy to RE-FILE Document No. #6 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the wrong event type was used to file the request for issuance of summons; the form used for the summons is blank. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Amended Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (vf) |
Filing 6 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT - SUMMONS REQUESTED - WRONG EVENT TYPE SELECTED FROM MENU - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to JAY GLOBAL ENTERPRISES, INC., GU-RUM CORPORATION d/b/a Jay Global En-terprises, re: #5 Amended Complaint. Document filed by Yelsom Emanuel Rodriguez Ramos..(Naydenskiy, Gennadiy) Modified on 12/2/2021 (vf). |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #1 Complaint against Gurum Corporation, Jay Global Enterprises, Inc. with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Yelsom Emanuel Rodriguez Ramos. Related document: #1 Complaint..(Naydenskiy, Gennadiy) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Gurum Corporation, Jay Global Enterprises, Inc., Kyung H Jung..(pc) |
Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge John P. Cronan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Gennadiy Naydenskiy. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: YELSOM RAMOS, Jay Global Enterprises, Inc.. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error; party name was entered in all caps; alias party name was omitted;. (pc) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to JAY GLOBAL ENTERPRISES, INC., GURUM CORPORATION d/b/a Jay Global Enterprises andKYUNG H JUNG, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by YELSOM RAMOS..(Naydenskiy, Gennadiy) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Naydenskiy, Gennadiy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gurum Corporation, Jay Global Enterprises, Inc., Kyung H Jung. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25223536)Document filed by YELSOM RAMOS..(Naydenskiy, Gennadiy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.