Evans v. The City of New York et al
| Jeniere K. Evans |
| The City of New York and Samaritan Daytop Village |
| 1:2021cv08660 |
| October 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| John P Cronan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Motion to Dismiss. The Court reviewed Defendant City of New York's letter and finds that a pre-motion conference is not necessary. Accordingly, Defendant City of New York may proceed in filing its motion to dismiss the complaint. Defendant City of New York shall file its motion to dismiss by December 30, 2021. Plaintiff shall file its opposition by January 21, 2022. Defendant City of New York shall file any reply to Plaintiff's opposition by February 1, 2022. Defendant City of New York is ordered to serve Plaintiff with a copy of its motion to dismiss and reply papers filed on ECF. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the letter motion pending on Dkt. 9 and to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 12/3/2021) (jca)
|
|
Filing 10
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Notice of Appearance and Letter Motion dated December 3, 2021 served on Jeniere K. Evans on December 3, 2021. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by The City of New York..(Bahrenburg, Richard)
|
|
Filing 9
LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Motion to Dismiss addressed to Judge John P. Cronan from Richard Bahrenburg dated December 3, 2021. Document filed by The City of New York..(Bahrenburg, Richard)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Richard Bahrenburg on behalf of The City of New York..(Bahrenburg, Richard)
|
|
Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk. Transmitted re: #11 Order on Motion for Leave to File Document,,,, to the Docket Assistant Clerk for case processing..(jca)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Motions due by 12/30/2021. Responses due by 1/21/2022 Replies due by 2/1/2022. (jca)
|
|
Mailed a copy of #11 Order on Motion for Leave to File Document to Jeniere K. Evans at 690 E. 182nd St., Apt. 3H, Bronx, NY 10457. (kh)
|
|
Filing 7
INFORMATION PACKAGE MAILED to Jeniere K. Evans 690 E. 182nd St. Apt. 3H Bronx, NY 10457, at, on 11/9/2021 Re: #5 Order of Service. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: a copy of the order of service or order to answer and other orders entered to date, Order granting IFP application, the individual practices of the district judge and magistrate judge assigned to your case, Instructions for Litigants Who Do Not Have Attorneys, Notice Regarding Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Case Files, a flyer about the free legal assistance clinic located in the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse (only in non prisoner cases), a Motions guide, a notice that the Pro Se Manual has been discontinued, a Notice of Change of Address form to use if your contact information changes, a handout explaining matters handled by magistrate judges and consent form to complete if all parties agree to proceed for all purposes before the magistrate judge, a form for you to complete if you consent to receive filings electronically (only in nonprisoner cases). (aan)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Samaritan Daytop Village, The City of New York. (aan)
|
|
FRCP 4 SERVICE PACKAGE HAND DELIVERED TO U.S.M.: on 11/9/2021 Re: Judge John P. Cronan #5 Order of Service. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: Complaint, Summons, IFP, Order of Service, Completed U.S.M. form(s) for defendant(s) Samaritan Daytop Village, The City of New York. (aan)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF SERVICE: The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, together with an information package. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to complete the USM-285 forms with the addresses for the City of New York and Samaritan Daytop Village and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 11/8/2021) (jca) Transmission to Pro Se Assistants for processing.
|
|
Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (bcu)
|
|
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge John P. Cronan. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(bcu)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 10/22/2021) (vn) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against Samaritan Daytop Village, The City of New York. Document filed by Jeniere K. Evans. (sac)
|
|
Filing 1
REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Jeniere K. Evans. (sac)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (sac)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
