Merson v. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. et al
| Michael Merson |
| GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. |
| 1:2021cv08752 |
| October 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Paul A Crotty |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Olivia Ann Everton on behalf of Goldman Sachs Group Inc...(Everton, Olivia)
|
|
Filing 14
RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Goldman Sachs Group Inc...(Boccuzzi, Carmine)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Carmine D. Boccuzzi, Jr on behalf of Goldman Sachs Group Inc...(Boccuzzi, Carmine)
|
|
Filing 12
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned attorneys for Plaintiff and Defendants as follows: The undersigned counsel for Defendants are authorized to and hereby acknowledge service of the summons and the Complaint in this action on behalf of all Defendants, provided, however, that acknowledgment of service and entry into this stipulation shall not waive or prejudice any, and Defendants expressly preserve all, rights, claims, and defenses, including, but not limited to, all defenses relating to jurisdiction and venue, except a defense as to the sufficiency of service of the summons and complaint and the form of the summons. Defendants shall have no obligation to answer or otherwise respond to, and each hereby is expressly relieved from answering or otherwise responding to, the Complaint, subject to the provisions of paragraph 3 below. Promptly after entry of the Order in this action (or in any consolidated action encompassing this action), counsel for Defendants and court-appointed lead counsel shall meet and confer regarding a schedule for the filing of an operative complaint and any answer, motion to dismiss or other response thereto. Within fourteen (14) days after entry of the Order, the court-appointed lead plaintiff(s) and Defendants shall jointly submit a proposed schedule to the Court and further set forth in this Order. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 11/15/2021) (rro)
|
|
Filing 11
PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Morgan Stanley..(Duggan, Charles)
|
|
Filing 10
RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Other Affiliate Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. 7-1 Marunouchi 2-chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-8330 for Morgan Stanley. Document filed by Morgan Stanley..(Duggan, Charles)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Daniel Jacob Schwartz on behalf of Morgan Stanley..(Schwartz, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Charles S. Duggan on behalf of Morgan Stanley..(Duggan, Charles)
|
|
Filing 7
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. Morgan Stanley served on 10/27/2021, answer due 11/17/2021. Service was accepted by Kartik Pandya, Service of Process Intake Clerk. Document filed by Michael Merson..(Laughlin, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 6
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. served on 10/27/2021, answer due 11/17/2021. Service was accepted by Avery Bernstein, Analyst, Authorized to Accept Service. Document filed by Michael Merson..(Laughlin, Thomas)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (aea)
|
|
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Paul A. Crotty. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (aea)
|
|
CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:21-cv-08413-PAC. Notice of Assignment to follow. (aea)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Morgan Stanley..(jgo)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Thomas Livezey Laughlin, IV. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code XX Out of State;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to New York;. (jgo)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Thomas Livezey Laughlin, IV. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Michael Merson; GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name was entered in all caps; party text was omitted;. (jgo)
|
|
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Unassigned. .(jgo)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (jgo)
|
|
CASE REFERRED TO Judge Paul A. Crotty as possibly related to 21-cv-8413. (jgo)
|
|
Filing 4
STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 21-cv-8413 (PAC). Document filed by Michael Merson..(Laughlin, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 3
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC. and MORGAN STANLEY, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Michael Merson..(Laughlin, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Laughlin, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC, Morgan Stanley. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25246938)Document filed by Michael Merson. (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Schedule A).(Laughlin, Thomas)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
