Moleon v. SP Plus Corporation
Plaintiff: Frantz Moleon
Defendant: SP Plus Corporation
Case Number: 1:2021cv08813
Filed: October 28, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Paul A Engelmayer
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12117
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER: All parties do not consent to conducting all further proceedings before a Magistrate Judge, including motions and trial. 28 U.S.C. 636(c). This case is to be tried to a jury. Any motion to amend or to join additional parties shall be filed within 20 days from the date of this Order. Deposition due by 1/31/2022. Fact Discovery due by 2/1/2022. Expert Discovery due by 3/15/2022. Estimate length of trial 3-4 days. Case Management Conference set for 3/1/2022 at 04:00 PM before Judge Paul A. Engelmayer. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 11/30/2021) (tg)
November 23, 2021 Filing 13 PRE-CONFERENCE STATEMENT (Jointly by the parties). Document filed by Frantz Moleon..(Karlin, Stewart)
November 23, 2021 Filing 12 PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN. Document filed by Frantz Moleon..(Karlin, Stewart)
November 15, 2021 NOTICE OF MEDIATOR ASSIGNMENT - Notice of assignment of mediator. Mediator Schedule due by 12/15/2021.(ah)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: The Court has received the parties' letters in Dkt. 21 Civ. 1398 (PAE) with respect to scheduling outstanding depositions and amending the case management plan. Dkts. 79, 80, 81. All parties agree to adjourn depositions until February 2022. The Court accordingly extends the deadline for fact discovery in this case, including all depositions, until February 1, 2022. This deadline will not be further adjourned. The Court expects to set a similar end date for fact discovery in Dkt. 21 Civ. 8813 (PAE). 1 An initial telephonic conference in that case is scheduled for November 30, 2021, at 11 :00 a.m. To ensure coordination across these two related cases, counsel for the parties in both cases are directed to attend that conference. Counsel should call into the Court's dedicated conference line at (888) 363-4749, and enter Access Code 468-4906, followed by the pound(#) key. Counsel are directed to review the Court's Emergency Individual Rules and Practices in Light ofCOVID-19, found at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-paul-engelmayer, for the Court's procedures for telephonic conferences and for instructions for communicating with chambers. All conferences with the Court are scheduled for a specific time; there is no other matter scheduled for that time, and counsel are directed to appear promptly. All pretrial conferences must be attended by the attorney who will serve as principal trial counsel. SO ORDERED. ( Fact Discovery due by 2/1/2022. Deposition due by 2/1/2022. Initial Conference set for 11/30/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge Paul A. Engelmayer.) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 11/10/2021) (va) Modified on 11/16/2021 (va).
November 5, 2021 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Initial Pretrial Order served on Shawn Matthew Clark, Esq on Nov 5, 2021. Service was accepted by Yes. Document filed by Frantz Moleon..(Karlin, Stewart)
November 5, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: An initial pretrial conference is hereby scheduled for November 30, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. This conference will be held telephonically. The parties should call into the Court's dedicated conference line at (888) 363-4749, and enter Access Code 468-4906, followed by the pound(#) key. Initial Conference set for 11/30/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge Paul A. Engelmayer. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 11/5/2021) (va)
November 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER OF AUTOMATIC REFERRAL TO MEDIATION (See M-10-468 Second Amended Standing Order). Please reference the Pilot Discovery Protocols, attached, and the Mediation Program Procedures (https://nysd.uscourts.gov/programs/mediation-adr). E-mail MediationOffice@nysd.uscourts.gov, telephone 212-805-0643. Mediator to be Assigned by 11/15/2021. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/1/15) (jpt)
November 4, 2021 Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint. Document filed by SP Plus Corporation..(Clark, Shawn)
November 1, 2021 Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (aea)
November 1, 2021 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (aea)
November 1, 2021 CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:21-cv-01398-PAE. Notice of Assignment to follow. (aea)
October 29, 2021 Filing 6 STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 1:21-cv-01398-PAE. Document filed by SP Plus Corporation..(Clark, Shawn)
October 29, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Stewart Lee Karlin on behalf of Frantz Moleon..(Karlin, Stewart)
October 29, 2021 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE RELATED CASE STATEMENT. Notice to Attorney Shawn Matthew Clark, for non compliance with Local Rule 13 of the Division of Business Among Judges. Attorney must electronically file the Related Case Statement. Use the event type Statement of Relatedness found under the event list Other Documents. (sj)
October 29, 2021 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Unassigned. (sj)
October 29, 2021 Case Designated ECF. (sj)
October 29, 2021 CASE REFERRED TO Judge Paul A. Engelmayer as possibly related to 1:21cv1398. (sj)
October 28, 2021 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, and #3 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement served on Frantz Moleon on October 28, 2021. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by SP Plus Corporation..(Clark, Shawn)
October 28, 2021 Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by SP Plus Corporation..(Clark, Shawn)
October 28, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Clark, Shawn)
October 28, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court, County of New York. Case Number: 159010/2021. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25258211).Document filed by SP Plus Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Summons & Complaint, #2 Exhibit B: Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit C: Notice to Clerk of Filing Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit D: Notice to Adverse Party).(Clark, Shawn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moleon v. SP Plus Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frantz Moleon
Represented By: Stewart Lee Karlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SP Plus Corporation
Represented By: Shawn Matthew Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?