Harris v. TD Ameritrade Clearing Inc.

Plaintiff: Jan Harris
Defendant: TD Ameritrade Clearing Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv08851
Filed: October 28, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Mary Kay Vyskocil
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 9, 2021 Filing 9 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, re: amending #4 Amended Complaint against TD Ameritrade Clearing Inc. Document filed by Jan Harris. Related document: #4 Amended Complaint.(sc)
December 1, 2021 Filing 8 INFORMATION PACKAGE MAILED to Jan Harris 101 Aupuni Street Apt. 420 Hilo 96720 Hawaii, at, on 12/1/2021 Re: #6 Order of Service. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: a copy of the order of service or order to answer and other orders entered to date, the individual practices of the district judge and magistrate judge assigned to your case, Instructions for Litigants Who Do Not Have Attorneys, Notice Regarding Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Case Files, a flyer about the free legal assistance clinic located in the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse (only in non prisoner cases), a Motions guide, a notice that the Pro Se Manual has been discontinued, a Notice of Change of Address form to use if your contact information changes, a handout explaining matters handled by magistrate judges and consent form to complete if all parties agree to proceed for all purposes before the magistrate judge, a form for you to complete if you consent to receive filings electronically (only in nonprisoner cases), one or more summonses (only if you have paid the fee in person or if the judge has ordered that a summons be issued to you) - 1 copies of Summons(es) mailed. (aan)
December 1, 2021 Filing 7 SUMMONS ISSUED as to TD Ameritrade Clearing Inc. (aan)
December 1, 2021 Filing 6 ORDER OF SERVICE: Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, paid the filing fees to commence this action. The Clerk of Court is directed to issue a summons as to Defendant TD Ameritrade Clearing Inc. Plaintiff is directed to serve the summons and complaint on Defendant within 90 days of the issuance of the summons. If within those 90 days, Plaintiff has not either served Defendant or requested an extension of time to do so, the Court may dismiss the claims against Defendant under Rules 4 and 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, together with an information package. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 12/1/2021) (tg) Transmission to Pro Se Assistants for processing.
November 23, 2021 Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (wb)
November 23, 2021 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil. Judge Laura Taylor Swain is no longer assigned to the case..(wb)
November 11, 2021 Filing 4 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR EQUITABLE RELIEF & DAMAGES, re: amending #1 Complaint against TD Ameritrade Clearing Inc. Document filed by Jan Harris. Related document: #1 Complaint.(sc)
November 10, 2021 Pro Se Payment of Fee Processed: $402.00 Check processed by the Finance Department on 11/10/2021, Receipt Number 465401288846. (stt)
November 1, 2021 Filing 3 ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE OR IFP APPLICATION: Plaintiff is directed to render payment of the filing fee or submit an IFP application to this Court's Pro Se Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Filing Fee due by 12/1/2021. In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Application due by 12/1/2021. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 11/1/2021) (Attachments: #1 IFP Application) (keb)
November 1, 2021 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(bcu)
October 28, 2021 Filing 2 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Jan Harris consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Jan Harris. (sac)
October 28, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TD Ameritrade Clearing Inc. Document filed by Jan Harris. (sac)
October 28, 2021 Case Designated ECF. (sac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris v. TD Ameritrade Clearing Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jan Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TD Ameritrade Clearing Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?