Ulanch v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. et al
| Mark Ulanch |
| Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Morgan Stanley |
| 1:2021cv08897 |
| October 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Paul A Crotty |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Olivia Ann Everton on behalf of Goldman Sachs Group, Inc...(Everton, Olivia)
|
|
Filing 16
RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Goldman Sachs Group, Inc...(Boccuzzi, Carmine)
|
|
Filing 15
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Carmine D. Boccuzzi, Jr on behalf of Goldman Sachs Group, Inc...(Boccuzzi, Carmine)
|
|
Filing 14
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned attorneys for Plaintiff and Defendants as follows: The undersigned counsel for Defendants are authorized to and hereby acknowledge service of the summons and the Complaint in this action on behalf of all Defendants, provided, however, that acknowledgment of service and entry into this stipulation shall not waive or prejudice any, and Defendants expressly preserve all, rights, claims, and defenses, including, but not limited to, all defenses relating to jurisdiction and venue, except a defense as to the sufficiency of service of the summons and complaint and the form of the summons.Defendants shall have no obligation to answer or otherwise respond to, and each hereby is expressly relieved from answering or otherwise responding to, the Complaint, subject to the provisions of paragraph 3 below. Promptly after entry of the Order in this action (or in any consolidated action encompassing this action), counsel for Defendants and court-appointed lead counsel shall meet and confer regarding a schedule for the filing of an operative complaint and any answer, motion to dismiss or other response thereto. Within fourteen (14) days after entry of the Order, the court-appointed lead plaintiff(s) and Defendants shall jointly submit a proposed schedule to the Court and further set forth in this Order. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 11/15/2021) (rro)
|
|
Filing 13
PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Morgan Stanley..(Duggan, Charles)
|
|
Filing 12
RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Other Affiliate Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. 7-1 Marunouchi 2-chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-8330 for Morgan Stanley. Document filed by Morgan Stanley..(Duggan, Charles)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Daniel Jacob Schwartz on behalf of Morgan Stanley..(Schwartz, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Charles S. Duggan on behalf of Morgan Stanley..(Duggan, Charles)
|
|
Filing 9
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. Morgan Stanley served on 11/4/2021, answer due 11/26/2021. Service was accepted by Kartik Pandya, Service of Process Intake Clerk. Document filed by Mark Ulanch..(Laughlin, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 8
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. served on 11/4/2021, answer due 11/26/2021. Service was accepted by Simon Ungureanu, Legal Dept., Authorized to Accept Service. Document filed by Mark Ulanch..(Laughlin, Thomas)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (aea)
|
|
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Paul A. Crotty. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (aea)
|
|
CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:21-cv-08413-PAC. Notice of Assignment to follow. (aea)
|
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Morgan Stanley. (vf)
|
|
Filing 6
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley, re: #5 Complaint. Document filed by Mark Ulanch..(Laughlin, Thomas)
|
|
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Unassigned. (vf)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Thomas Livezey Laughlin, IV. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Mark Ulanch. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted. (vf)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (vf)
|
|
CASE REFERRED TO Judge Paul A. Crotty as possibly related to 1:21-cv-8413. (vf)
|
|
Filing 5
COMPLAINT against Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Morgan Stanley. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25266094)Document filed by Mark Ulanch. (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Schedule A).(Laughlin, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 4
STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 21-cv-8413 (PAC). Document filed by Mark Ulanch..(Laughlin, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 3
FILING ERROR SUMMONS NOT LINKED TO CORRESPONDING PLEADING- REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Mark Ulanch..(Laughlin, Thomas) Modified on 11/1/2021 (vf).
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Laughlin, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 1
FILING ERROR DEFICIENT PLEADING - PDF ERROR - COMPLAINT against Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Morgan Stanley. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25265744)Document filed by Mark Ulanch..(Laughlin, Thomas) Modified on 11/1/2021 (jgo).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
