Trejos Hermanos Sucesores S.A. v. Verizon Communications Inc.
Trejos Hermanos Sucesores S.A. |
Verizon Communications Inc. |
1:2021cv08928 |
November 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Ronnie Abrams |
Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 DECLARATION of Scott A. Edelman in Support re: #26 MOTION In Opposition To Plaintiff's Pre-Discovery Motion For Summary Judgment Pursuant to Rule 56(d) .. Document filed by Verizon Communications Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Complaint, #2 Exhibit B- Judgment, #3 Exhibit C- Appeal, #4 Exhibit D- Annulment Appeal, #5 Exhibit E- ICE-GTE contract, #6 Exhibit F- Master Purchase Agreement, #7 Exhibit G- Email).(Edelman, Scott) |
Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #26 MOTION In Opposition To Plaintiff's Pre-Discovery Motion For Summary Judgment Pursuant to Rule 56(d) . . Document filed by Verizon Communications Inc...(Edelman, Scott) |
Filing 26 MOTION In Opposition To Plaintiff's Pre-Discovery Motion For Summary Judgment Pursuant to Rule 56(d) . Document filed by Verizon Communications Inc...(Edelman, Scott) |
Filing 25 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Perlette Michele Jura on behalf of Verizon Communications Inc...(Jura, Perlette) |
Filing 24 ORDER granting #22 Motion for Miguel Loza Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Ronnie Abrams)(Text Only Order) (arc) |
>>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #22 MOTION for Miguel Loza Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-25427914. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu) |
Filing 23 ORDER: As agreed upon at that conference, the following briefing schedule shall govern Defendant's Rule 56(d) motion in opposition to Plaintiff's summary judgment motion: Defendant shall have until December 30, 2021 to file a Rule 56(d) motion in opposition to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, with a 25-page limit. Plaintiff shall have until January 21, 2022 to reply to Defendant's Rule 56(d) motion, with a 25-page limit. Defendant shall have until February 11, 2022, or 21 days after Plaintiff files its response, whichever is earlier, to sur-reply to Plaintiff's brief, with a 10-page limit. As further agreed upon at the conference, these briefs shall also address the issue of whether N.Y. C.P.L.R. 3213 has been appropriately invoked in this case. SO ORDERED. ( Responses due by 12/30/2021. Replies due by 1/21/2022. Surreplies due by 2/11/2022.) (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 12/6/2021) (va) |
Filing 22 MOTION for Miguel Loza Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-25427914. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Verizon Communications Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Miguel Loza Jr., #2 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order).(Loza, Miguel) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Ronnie Abrams: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 12/3/2021. (arc) |
Filing 21 JOINT LETTER addressed to Judge Ronnie Abrams from Benjamin W. Graham dated December 1, 2021 re: Initial Status Conference. Document filed by Trejos Hermanos Sucesores S.A...(Graham, Benjamin) |
Filing 20 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #19 Letter filed by Verizon Communications Inc. ENDORSEMENT: The Court will hold the initial status conference in this case on Friday, December 3, 2021 at 10:30 a.m. The dial-in information for the conference is as follows: Call-In Number: (888) 363-4749; Access Code: 1015508. The parties are reminded that this is a public line that is available to the public and members of the press, but that recordings are not permitted. By no later than December 1, 2021, the parties shall file the joint letter discussed in the Court's Order of November 15, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Initial Conference set for 12/3/2021 at 10:30 AM before Judge Ronnie Abrams.) (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 11/23/2021) (jca) |
Filing 19 JOINT LETTER addressed to Judge Ronnie Abrams from Anne Champion and Ana Reyes dated November 22, 2021 re: conference scheduling. Document filed by Verizon Communications Inc...(Champion, Anne) |
Filing 18 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #17 Letter filed by Verizon Communications Inc. ENDORSEMENT: The Court finds that a conference to discuss the issues raised in the parties' letter would aid the Court in scheduling summary judgment briefing. Accordingly, the Court is amenable to moving the December 17, 2021 conference to an earlier date if the parties are so available. By no later than November 29, 2021, the parties shall file a letter with the Court stating the parties' availability for a telephonic conference the week of November 29. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 11/22/2021) (mml) |
Filing 17 JOINT LETTER addressed to Judge Ronnie Abrams from Anne Champion and Ana Reyes dated November 18, 2021 re: proposed briefing schedule for Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. Document filed by Verizon Communications Inc...(Champion, Anne) |
Filing 16 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Trejos Hermanos Sucesores S.A...(Graham, Benjamin) |
Filing 15 RULE 56.1 STATEMENT. Document filed by Trejos Hermanos Sucesores S.A...(Graham, Benjamin) |
Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT of Grant Thornton Int'l Ltd. in Support re: #11 MOTION for Summary Judgment .. Document filed by Trejos Hermanos Sucesores S.A...(Graham, Benjamin) |
Filing 13 AFFIDAVIT of Rolando Lacl Ziga in Support re: #11 MOTION for Summary Judgment .. Document filed by Trejos Hermanos Sucesores S.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Judgment, #3 Exhibit C - Appellate Decision, #4 Exhibit D - 2d Appellate Decision, #5 Exhibit E - Corporate Guaranty, #6 Exhibit F - SEC Filing, #7 Exhibit G - Verizon Website).(Graham, Benjamin) |
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #11 MOTION for Summary Judgment . . Document filed by Trejos Hermanos Sucesores S.A...(Graham, Benjamin) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Summary Judgment . Document filed by Trejos Hermanos Sucesores S.A.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order).(Graham, Benjamin) |
Filing 10 LETTER addressed to Judge Ronnie Abrams from Benjamin W. Graham dated November 15, 2021 re: Motion for Summary Judgment. Document filed by Trejos Hermanos Sucesores S.A...(Graham, Benjamin) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Benjamin Walker Graham on behalf of Trejos Hermanos Sucesores S.A...(Graham, Benjamin) |
Filing 8 ORDER AND NOTICE OF INITIAL CONFERENCE: The Court will hold this conference by telephone. The parties shall use the dial-in information provided below to call into the conference: Call-in Number: (888) 363-4749; Access Code: 1015508. This conference line is open to the public. Initial Conference set for 12/17/2021 at 02:00 PM before Judge Ronnie Abrams. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 11/15/2021) (tg) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Scott A. Edelman to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Ronnie Abrams)(Text Only Order) (arc) |
>>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #6 MOTION for Scott A. Edelman to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-25290192. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (aea) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Scott A. Edelman to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-25290192. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Verizon Communications Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Scott A. Edelman, #2 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order).(Edelman, Scott) |
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Ronnie Abrams. Judge Gregory H. Woods is no longer assigned to the case..(wb) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of 1) Notice of Removal (with Exhibit A), dated November 1, 2021; 2) Civil Cover Sheet, dated November 1, 2021; 3) Defendant Verizon Communications Inc.s Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement, dated November 1, 2021; 4) SDNY Electronic Case Filing Rules & Instructions; 5) District Judge Gregory H. Woods Individual Rules of Practice in Civil Cases; and 6) Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Mosess Individual Practices served on Counsel for Plaintiff Trejos Hermanos Sucesores S.A. on November 2, 2021. Service was made by Federal Express overnight delivery. Document filed by Verizon Communications Inc...(Champion, Anne) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court, County of New York. Case Number: 656161/2021..Document filed by Verizon Communications Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - New York State Court Filings).(Champion, Anne) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Anne Marie Champion. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Origin code 1 (Original Proceeding); Citizenship Plaintiff code 2 (Citizen of Another State); Citizenship Defendant code 3 (Citizen or Subject of a Foreign Country). The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Origin code has been modified to 2 (Removal from State Court); the Citizenship Plaintiff code has been modified to 3 (Citizen or Subject of a Foreign Country); the Citizenship Defendant code has been modified to 1 (Citizen of This State). (sj) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Anne Marie Champion to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Notice of Removal. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Pursuant to ECF Filing Rule 13.3, Notice of Removal exhibits must be filed as attachments and labeled. Each attachment must be clearly titled in the ECF entry so the subject of the exhibit is clear. They cannot be labeled "Exhibit A, Exhibit B, etc.". Re-file the pleading using the event type Notice of Removal found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (sj) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Gregory H. Woods. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj) |
Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj) |
Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Verizon Communications Inc...(Champion, Anne) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Champion, Anne) |
Filing 1 FILING ERROR - EXHIBITS NOT CLEARLY TITLED NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court, County of New York. Case Number: 656161/2021. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25269901).Document filed by Verizon Communications Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A).(Champion, Anne) Modified on 11/2/2021 (sj). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.