Jiang v. Mayorkas et al
Haipeng Jiang |
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Director Tim Houghton and Tim Houghton |
1:2021cv08934 |
November 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Mary Kay Vyskocil |
Mandamus & Other |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Tim Houghton, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas. (sj) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Tim Houghton, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. Document filed by Haipeng Jiang..(Li, Zhen) |
Filing 2 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT - SUMMONS REQUEST - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Tim Houghton, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. Document filed by Haipeng Jiang..(Li, Zhen) Modified on 11/23/2021 (vf). |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Zhen Liang Li to RE-FILE Document No. #2 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): defendant party text error. Defendant party name text must correspond exactly to pleading caption. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (vf) |
Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Zhen Liang Li. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Tim Houghton. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted. (sj) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to Attorney Zhen Liang Li. Attorney must electronically file the Civil Cover Sheet. Use the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents. (sj) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Zhen Liang Li. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code Albany. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to New York. (sj) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj) |
Filing 1 PETITION IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Tim Houghton, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25271432).Document filed by Haipeng Jiang..(Li, Zhen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.