Lian et al v. Garland et al
| Yan Lian and Yizhen He |
| Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Director UR MENDOZA JADDOU, Acting Asc. Director Michael Valverde, Merrick B. Garland and Michael Valverde |
| 1:2021cv08965 |
| November 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Vernon S Broderick |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Michael Valverde..(Byars, Michael) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael James Byars on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Michael Valverde..(Byars, Michael) |
| Filing 10 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Michael Valverde. (vf) |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou. (vf) |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Alejandro Mayorkas. (vf) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Merrick B. Garland. (vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Vernon S. Broderick. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Sam Faez Haddad. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Michael Valverde, UR MENDOZA JADDOU. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name was entered in all caps; party text was omitted. (vf) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Michael Valverde, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus,. Document filed by Yizhen He, Yan Lian..(Haddad, Sam) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus,. Document filed by Yizhen He, Yan Lian..(Haddad, Sam) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Alejandro Mayorkas, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus,. Document filed by Yizhen He, Yan Lian..(Haddad, Sam) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Merrick B. Garland, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus,. Document filed by Yizhen He, Yan Lian..(Haddad, Sam) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Haddad, Sam) |
| Filing 1 FIRST COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Merrick B. Garland, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, Alejandro Mayorkas, Michael Valverde (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25273741).Document filed by Yan Lian, Yizhen He. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-F).(Haddad, Sam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
