Tanner v. Carter et al
| Marquis Tanner |
| Warden Carter, Warden Guerra, Captain John Doe and Captain Horton |
| 1:2021cv09079 |
| November 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Mailed a copy of #5 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint), #4 Order of Dismissal, to Marquis Tanner, NYSID: 02568346Q, B&C: 2412002342 at George R. Vierno Center, 09-09 Hazen Street, East Elmhurst, NY 11370. (Attachments: # 1 Pro Se Appeal Package) (dsh) |
Filing 5
CIVIL JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the complaint is dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to submit a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP application") and prisoner authorization or pay the $402.00 in filing fees. See 28 U.S.C. 1914, 1915. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 12/10/2021) (Attachments: #1 Pro Se Appeal Package) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: By order dated November 4, 2021, the Court directed Plaintiff, within thirty days, to submit a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP application") and prisoner authorization or pay the $402.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this Court. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an IFP application and prisoner authorization or paid the filing fees. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. 1914, 1915. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 12/10/2021) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE OR IFP APPLICATION & PRISONER AUTHORIZATION: Plaintiff is directed to render payment of the filing fee or submit an IFP application & Prisoner Authorization to this Court's Pro Se Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Filing Fee due by 12/6/2021. In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Application due by 12/6/2021. Prisoner Authorization Form due by 12/6/2021. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 11/4/2021) (asg) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Mailed a copy of #3 Order Directing Payment of Fee or IFP Application & Prisoner Authorization to Marquis Tanner, NYSID: 02568346Q, B&C: 2412002392 at George R. Vierno Center, 09-09 Hazen Street, East Elmhurst, NY 11370. (kh) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(wb) |
| Mailed a copy of #1 Order, to Marquis Tanner, NYSID: 02568346Q, B&C: 2412002392 at George R. Vierno Center, 09-09 Hazen Street, East Elmhurst, NY 11370. (dsh) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Carter, John Doe, Guerra, Horton. Document filed by Marquis Tanner. (sac) |
|
Filing 1
ORDER: The Court severs the claims of all plaintiffs under Fed. R. Civ. P. 21. Michael J. Lee will proceed as the sole plaintiff in this action. The Clerk of Court is directed to open separate civil actions with new docket numbers for the following plaintiffs: Daeshawn McCray #2412100805; Kevin Terry #4412000303; Jason Young #2412001869; Tayquan Mosley #1412000323; Mitchell Thompson #3492001965; Genghis Khan #2412101804; Rashawn Kingsberry #3492000022; Hassan Bility #1412003090; Darren Boyd #5412100385; Alejandro Mejia #3491904058; Gustave Brown #2411902513; Frankie Corchado #2412000121; Luke Dinan #4412101406; William Stevenson #3412100191; Rashid Turner-Hawkins #2412000097; Tyrefe Kelly #1412101303; Kenneth Watts #3492100023; Chibueze Ejiaku #3491902389; Lasalle Goring #5412100443; William Daniels #4412000556; Marquis Tanner #2412002342; Maurice Pye, Sr. #2412001589; Michael Blount #2412101155; Andre C. Jones, Sr. #1411806305; Termain Kirby #1412001914. A copy of the complaint (ECF No. 1), this order, and the corresponding IFP application and prisoner authorization should be docketed in each new case. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to each of the plaintiffs at the addresses listed on the docket and note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 11/1/2021) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
