Jones v. Kehan et al
| Robert Jones |
| Scott M. Kehan, James Meehan and Scott M. Lekan |
| 1:2021cv09315 |
| November 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Mailed a copy of #3 Order 30 Days Amended Complaint (case opening), to Robert Jones, 19-A-1814 at Shawangunk Corr. Fac., P.O. Box 700, Wallkill, NY 12589. (dsh) |
Filing 3
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court dismisses this action. The Court dismisses Plaintiff's claims in which he seeks the discharge of his child-support debt under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine or under the domestic-relations abstention doctrine. The Court dismisses Plaintiff's remaining claims for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1). The Court grants Plaintiff 30 days' leave to file an amended complaint to address the deficiencies discussed above. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within the time allowed, the Court will enter judgment dismissing this action for the reasons stated in this order. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Court directs the Clerk of Court to mail a copy of this order Plaintiff and note service on the docket. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 1/3/22) (rdz) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Pro Se Payment of Fee Processed: Check $402.00 processed by the Finance Department on 12/01/2021, Receipt Number 465401289940. (jcf) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEES OR IFP APPLICATION & PRISONER AUTHORIZATION: Plaintiff is directed to render payment of $2.00 of the remaining fees or submit an IFP application & Prisoner Authorization to this Court's Pro Se Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).Fees due by 12/16/2021. In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Application due by 12/16/2021. Prisoner Authorization Form due by 12/16/2021. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on November 16, 2021) (Attachments: #1 IFP application, #2 Prisioner Authorization) (jjg) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Mailed a copy of #2 Order Directing Payment of Fee or IFP Application & Prisoner Authorization, to Robert Jones, 19-A-1814 at Shawangunk Corr. Fac., P.O. Box 700, Wallkill, NY 12589. (Attachments: # 1 IFP application, # 2 Prisioner Authorization) (dsh) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (aea) |
| Deficient Pro Se Payment of Fee Received: Incorrect Amount received by the Finance Department on 11/12/2021, in the amount of $400. Payment will be held by the Finance Office pending further order of the Court. (jcf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Scott M. Lekan, James Meehan. Document filed by Robert Jones.(rdz) Modified on 12/13/2021 (rdz). |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
