UMG Recordings, Inc. v. OpenDeal Inc.
Plaintiff: UMG Recordings, Inc.
Defendant: OpenDeal Inc. doing business as Republic
Case Number: 1:2021cv09358
Filed: November 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Analisa Torres
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER denying #20 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference; granting #20 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #20 . GRANTED in part, DENIED in part. The Court's order of November 30, 2021, directed the parties to submit a joint letter and proposed case management plan by February 1, 2022. ECF No. 11. The Court did not schedule an initial pretrial conference for that date. The parties' request to adjourn the deadline to submit a joint letter and proposed case management plan is DENIED. Defendant's request to extend the deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint to January 18, 2022, is GRANTED. So Ordered. OpenDeal Inc. answer due 1/18/2022. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 1/7/2022) (js)
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 JOINT LETTER MOTION to Adjourn Conference addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from David Donahue, Esq., and John J. Rosenberg, Esq. dated 1/6/2022., JOINT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint,, addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from David Donahue, Esq., and John J. Rosenberg, Esq. dated 1/6/2022. Document filed by UMG Recordings, Inc...(Donahue, David)
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 DECLARATION of David Donahue - Service re: #1 Complaint,, #3 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #8 Summons Issued, #4 AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark - Notice of Submission by Attorney, #2 Civil Cover Sheet . Document filed by UMG Recordings, Inc...(Donahue, David)
December 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER granting in part and denying in part #13 Letter Motion for Conference re: #13 LETTER MOTION for Conference Pre-Motion addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from David Donahue dated December 7, 2021. The parties' request for a pre-motion conference is DENIED. Plaintiff's request to file a motion for a preliminary injunction is GRANTED. Accordingly, 1. By January 24, 2022, Plaintiff shall file its motion for a preliminary injunction. 2. By February 14, 2022, Defendant shall file its opposition papers. 3. By February 28, 2022, Plaintiff shall file its reply, if any. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at ECF No. 13. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 12/16/2021) (kv)
December 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Set/Reset Deadlines: Motions due by 1/24/2022. Responses due by 2/14/2022 Replies due by 2/28/2022. (kv)
December 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 LETTER RESPONSE to Motion addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from John J. Rosenberg dated 12/14/21 re: #13 LETTER MOTION for Conference Pre-Motion addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from David Donahue dated December 7, 2021. . Document filed by OpenDeal Inc...(Perala, Brett)
December 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Brett Thomas Perala on behalf of OpenDeal Inc...(Perala, Brett)
December 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by OpenDeal Inc...(Rosenberg, John)
December 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by John Jacob Rosenberg on behalf of OpenDeal Inc...(Rosenberg, John)
December 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 LETTER MOTION for Conference Pre-Motion addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from David Donahue dated December 7, 2021. Document filed by UMG Recordings, Inc...(Donahue, David)
November 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 11/30/2021) (kv)
November 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to submit a joint letter and a jointly proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order by February 1, 2022, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the instructions set forth below. (as further set forth herein). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 11/30/2021) (kv)
November 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. (as further set forth herein). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 11/30/2021) (kv)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 1116, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following trademark(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)..(jgo)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to OpenDeal Inc...(jgo)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Case Designated ECF. (jgo)
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Daniel Michael Nuzzaci on behalf of UMG Recordings, Inc...(Nuzzaci, Daniel)
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jason Douglas Jones on behalf of UMG Recordings, Inc...(Jones, Jason)
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to OpenDeal Inc. d/b/a Republic, re: #1 Complaint,,. Document filed by UMG Recordings, Inc...(Donahue, David)
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review..(Donahue, David)
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Universal Music Group, N.V. for UMG Recordings, Inc.. Document filed by UMG Recordings, Inc...(Donahue, David)
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Donahue, David)
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against OpenDeal Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25324004)Document filed by UMG Recordings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Billboard article, #2 Exhibit B - Billboard article, #3 Exhibit C - Rolling Stone article, #4 Exhibit D - Registrations, #5 Exhibit E - Communication, #6 Exhibit F - Communication, #7 Exhibit G - Webpage, #8 Exhibit H - Manifesto, #9 Exhibit I - cease and desist letter, #10 Exhibit J - Webpage, #11 Exhibit K - Webpage, #12 Exhibit L - Tweet, #13 Exhibit M - Article, #14 Exhibit N - Article).(Donahue, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UMG Recordings, Inc. v. OpenDeal Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UMG Recordings, Inc.
Represented By: Daniel Michael Nuzzaci
Represented By: Jason Douglas Jones
Represented By: David Donahue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OpenDeal Inc. doing business as Republic
Represented By: Brett Thomas Perala
Represented By: John Jacob Rosenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?