Chen v. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. et al
| Kai Chen |
| Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley |
| Lei Bian |
| 1:2021cv09564 |
| November 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Paul A Crotty |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Calendar Entry *DATE CHANGE*: The Status Conference scheduled to go forward on Thursday, January 13, 2022 is rescheduled to: Tuesday, January 25, 2022 @ 3:30 PM before Judge Paul A. Crotty, U.S.D.J, via teleconference. Dial-in: 888-363-4749. Access: 8539662. Reason for adjournment (on consent): the 1/13/22 not a convenient date for the parties. A PDF IS NOT ATTACHED TO THIS ENTRY (reset via e-mail communication by: David Gonzalez - Courtroom Deputy). (dgo) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Non-Opposition by Lei Bian to Competing Lead Plaintiff Motions. Document filed by Lei Bian..(Stone, Ralph) |
| NOTICE of Conference: Status Conference set for Thursday, January 13, 2022 at 11:00 AM via teleconference before the Honorable Paul A. Crotty, U.S.D.J. Dial-in: 888-363-4749. Access: 8539662. Counsel for all sides and related dockets are directed to appear. If the date is not convenient, either party can e-mail three (3) mutually convenient dates to the Courtroom Deputy at: David_C_Gonzalez@nysd.uscourts.gov. A PDF IS NOT ATTACHED TO THIS ENTRY ----- (By: David Gonzalez - Courtroom Deputy). -----(dgo) |
Filing 20
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned attorneys for Plaintiff and Defendants as follows: (As further set forth herein.) So ordered. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 1/3/2022) (va)
|
| Filing 19 DECLARATION of Ralph Stone in Support re: #17 MOTION to Appoint Counsel . MOTION to Appoint Lei Bian to serve as lead plaintiff(s) . MOTION to Consolidate Cases 1:21-cv-08752 .. Document filed by Lei Bian. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D).(Stone, Ralph) |
| Filing 18 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #17 MOTION to Appoint Counsel . MOTION to Appoint Lei Bian to serve as lead plaintiff(s) . MOTION to Consolidate Cases 1:21-cv-08752 . . Document filed by Lei Bian..(Stone, Ralph) |
| Filing 17 MOTION to Appoint Counsel ., MOTION to Appoint Lei Bian to serve as lead plaintiff(s) ., MOTION to Consolidate Cases 1:21-cv-08752 . Document filed by Lei Bian. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order).(Stone, Ralph) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Olivia Ann Everton on behalf of Goldman Sachs Group Inc...(Everton, Olivia) |
| Filing 15 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Goldman Sachs Group Inc...(Boccuzzi, Carmine) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Carmine D. Boccuzzi, Jr on behalf of Goldman Sachs Group Inc...(Boccuzzi, Carmine) |
| Filing 13 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Morgan Stanley..(Duggan, Charles) |
| Filing 12 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Other Affiliate Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. for Morgan Stanley. Document filed by Morgan Stanley..(Duggan, Charles) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Daniel Jacob Schwartz on behalf of Morgan Stanley..(Schwartz, Daniel) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Charles S. Duggan on behalf of Morgan Stanley..(Duggan, Charles) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by James Michael LoPiano on behalf of Kai Chen..(LoPiano, James) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joseph Alexander Hood, II on behalf of Kai Chen..(Hood, Joseph) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Paul A. Crotty. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(wb) |
| CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:21-cv-08752-PAC. Notice of Assignment to follow. (wb) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (wb) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Goldman Sachs Group Inc...(pc) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Morgan Stanley..(pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Jeremy Alan Lieberman. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Kai Chen. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted;. (pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Unassigned. .(pc) |
| CASE REFERRED TO Judge Paul A. Crotty as possibly related to 21cv8752. (pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| Filing 5 STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 21-cv-08752. Document filed by Kai Chen..(Lieberman, Jeremy) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Morgan Stanley, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Kai Chen..(Lieberman, Jeremy) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Goldman Sachs Group Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Kai Chen..(Lieberman, Jeremy) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Lieberman, Jeremy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Morgan Stanley. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25353921)Document filed by Kai Chen..(Lieberman, Jeremy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
