Tavarez v. Brodofication LLC
| Victoriano Tavarez |
| Brodofication LLC |
| 1:2021cv09796 |
| November 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Lewis J Liman |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint and Request for Adjournment of Initial Pre-Trial Conference addressed to Judge Lewis J. Liman from Sonali Setia dated January 14, 2022. The time for defendant to answer or respond to the Complaint is extended to February 16, 2022. The Initial Pretrial Conference is rescheduled to March 4, 2022 at 2:00PM. Parties are directed to dial into the Court's teleconference line at 888-251-2909 and use access code 2123101. Parties are reminded to jointly submit, by one week prior to the conference, a proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order consistent with the Court's individual practices. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED. Brodofication LLC answer due 2/16/2022. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Lewis J. Liman)(Text Only Order) (mf)
|
| Set/Reset Hearings: Initial Conference set for 3/4/2022 at 02:00 PM before Judge Lewis J. Liman. (mf) |
| Filing 11 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint and Request for Adjournment of Initial Pre-Trial Conference addressed to Judge Lewis J. Liman from Sonali Setia dated January 14, 2022. Document filed by Brodofication LLC..(Setia, Sonali) |
|
Filing 10
NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: This case has been assigned to me for all purposes. It is hereby: ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an Initial Pretrial Conference by TELEPHONE on February 4, 2022, at 2:00 p.m. Parties are directed to dial into the Court's teleconference number at 888-251-2909, Access Code 2123101, and follow the necessary prompts, as further set forth. Counsel for Plaintiff is ordered to notify all counsel of this Notice. (Telephone Conference set for 2/4/2022 at 02:00 PM before Judge Lewis J. Liman. Initial Conference set for 2/4/2022 at 02:00 PM before Judge Lewis J. Liman.) (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 1/4/2022) (mml)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #8 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Lewis J. Liman from Alexander Leonard dated December 14, 2021.. All Defendants (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Lewis J. Liman)(Text Only Order) (Liman, Lewis)
|
| Filing 8 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Lewis J. Liman from Alexander Leonard dated December 14, 2021. Document filed by Brodofication LLC..(Leonard, Alexander) |
| Filing 7 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Brodofication LLC..(Leonard, Alexander) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sonali Setia on behalf of Brodofication LLC..(Setia, Sonali) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Alexander Wilde Leonard on behalf of Brodofication LLC..(Leonard, Alexander) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Brodofication LLC..(pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Lewis J. Liman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Brodofication LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Victoriano Tavarez..(Mizrahi, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Mizrahi, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Brodofication LLC. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25376513)Document filed by Victoriano Tavarez..(Mizrahi, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tavarez v. Brodofication LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Victoriano Tavarez | |
| Represented By: | Joseph H Mizrahi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Brodofication LLC | |
| Represented By: | Alexander Wilde Leonard |
| Represented By: | Sonali Setia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
