In Re: Kossoff PLLC

Case Number:	1:2021cv09938
Filed:	November 30, 2021
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
Nature of Suit:	Bankruptcy Appeal (801)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 11, 2022	Filing 18 ORDER denying 12 Motion for Reconsideration re 12 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 11 Order Dismissing Appeal. filed by Mitchell H. Kossoff. Appellant's motion for reconsideration is denied for the reasons stated in App ellee's opposition brief. (See Dkt. No. 16 (21-CV-9938).) Appellant has failed to demonstrate, as required, that the Court overlooked controlling decisions of law or made clear errors of law. See, e.g., Shrader v. CSX Transp. Inc., 70 F.3d 255, 257 (2d Cir. 1995). Moreover, it is clear that the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion or err in holding Appellant in contempt. Accordingly, Appellant's motions for reconsideration are DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions at Docket Number 9 (21- CV-9924) and Docket Number 12 (21-CV-9938). So Ordered. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 1/11/2022) (js)
November 30, 2021	Filing 8 ORDER: Appellant's motion to stay is granted through December 2, 2021, and the Trustee shall file its response by December 1, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 11/30/2021) (mml)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 11, 2022

Filing 18 ORDER denying 12 Motion for Reconsideration re 12 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 11 Order Dismissing Appeal. filed by Mitchell H. Kossoff. Appellant's motion for reconsideration is denied for the reasons stated in App ellee's opposition brief. (See Dkt. No. 16 (21-CV-9938).) Appellant has failed to demonstrate, as required, that the Court overlooked controlling decisions of law or made clear errors of law. See, e.g., Shrader v. CSX Transp. Inc., 70 F.3d 255, 257 (2d Cir. 1995). Moreover, it is clear that the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion or err in holding Appellant in contempt. Accordingly, Appellant's motions for reconsideration are DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions at Docket Number 9 (21- CV-9924) and Docket Number 12 (21-CV-9938). So Ordered. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 1/11/2022) (js)

November 30, 2021

Filing 8 ORDER: Appellant's motion to stay is granted through December 2, 2021, and the Trustee shall file its response by December 1, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 11/30/2021) (mml)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re: Kossoff PLLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?