Liesen v. International Business Machines, Corp.
| David Liesen |
| International Business Machines, Corp. |
| 1:2021cv10128 |
| November 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Jesse M Furman |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 dj |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: In light of the fact that the above-captioned actions involve common questions of law and fact, it is hereby ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 42(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, case number 21-CV-10128 is consolidated under case number 21-CV-9574. As noted in the Court's previous Order regarding consolidation, see No. 21-CV-9574, ECF No. 5, notwithstanding such consolidation, the consolidated cases will "retain their separate identities." Hall v. Hall, 138 S. Ct. 1118, 1128-31 (2018). The Clerk of Court is directed to consolidate case number 21-CV-10128 under case number 21-CV-9574 and to close case number 21-CV-10128. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 12/1/2021) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-09574-JMF, 1:21-cv-10128-JMF (tg)
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Jesse M. Furman. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (aea) |
| Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (aea) |
| CONSOLIDATED MEMBER CASE: Create association to 1:21-cv-09574-JMF.. (tg) |
| CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:21-cv-06296-JMF. Notice of Assignment to follow. (aea) |
| CASE REFERRED TO Judge Jesse M. Furman as possibly related to 21-cv-6296. (jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Unassigned. .(jgo) |
| Filing 3 STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 21-cv-06296. Document filed by David Liesen..(Liss-Riordan, Shannon) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Liss-Riordan, Shannon) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against International Business Machines, Corp.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25394798)Document filed by David Liesen..(Liss-Riordan, Shannon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Liesen v. International Business Machines, Corp. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David Liesen | |
| Represented By: | Shannon Liss-Riordan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: International Business Machines, Corp. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
