Pizarro v. Quinstreet PL Inc. d/b/a AmOne
| Sharon Pizarro |
| Quinstreet PL Inc. d/b/a AmOne and Quinstreet PL Inc. a California Corporation doing business as AmOne |
| 1:2021cv10139 |
| November 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Edgardo Ramos |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: granting #10 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. The Application is Granted. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 1/19/2022) (ama)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Quinstreet PL Inc. answer due 2/4/2022. (ama) |
| Filing 10 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Paul A. Rosenthal dated January 18, 2022. Document filed by Quinstreet PL Inc...(Rosenthal, Paul) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: granting #8 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. The Application is Granted.. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 12/08/2021) (ama)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Quinstreet PL Inc. answer due 1/21/2022. (ama) |
| Filing 8 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Paul A. Rosenthal dated December 7, 2021. Document filed by Quinstreet PL Inc...(Rosenthal, Paul) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Paul A. Rosenthal on behalf of Quinstreet PL Inc...(Rosenthal, Paul) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Quinstreet PL Inc. served on 12/1/2021, answer due 12/22/2021. Service was accepted by Koy Saechao. Document filed by Sharon Pizarro..(Dapeer, Rachel) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Quinstreet PL Inc. (vf) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Dapeer, Rachel) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Quinstreet PL Inc d/b/a AmOne, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Sharon Pizarro..(Dapeer, Rachel) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Rachel Dapeer to RE-FILE Document No. #2 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the issuance of summons is not correct. Attach the Summons PDF form only. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to attorney Rachel Dapeer to Document No. #2 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the wrong event type was used to file the civil cover sheet. The Civil Cover Sheet form is filed as a separate event, not as an attachment. Re-file the document using the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents and attach the correct PDF. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Rachel Dapeer. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Quinstreet PL Inc. d/b/a AmOne., Sharon Pizarro. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party role was entered incorrectly; party text was omitted; alias party name was entered incorrectly. (vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to attorney Rachel Dapeer to Document No. #2 Request for Issuance of Summons,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Signature Error, form is not signed; and Courthouse Assignment Section Error. Place an [X] in One Box only. Re-file the document using the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents and attach the correct PDF. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Rachel Dapeer. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Cause of Action code Civil Miscellaneous Case - Other. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Cause of Action code has been modified to 47:227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Edgardo Ramos. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Quinstreet PL Inc d/b/a AmOne, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Sharon Pizarro. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet).(Dapeer, Rachel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Quinstreet PL Inc. d/b/a AmOne. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25398339)Document filed by Sharon Pizarro..(Dapeer, Rachel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
