Contreras v. Snap-On Incorporated
Plaintiff: Yensy Contreras
Defendant: Snap-On Incorporated
Case Number: 1:2021cv10160
Filed: November 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: J Paul Oetken
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. DEFENDANT SHALL ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE FEBRUARY 4, 2022. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge J. Paul Oetken)(Text Only Order) (egj)
January 5, 2022 Filing 7 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge J. Paul Oetken from Karla Del Pozo Garcia dated January 5, 2022. Document filed by Snap-On Incorporated..(Del Pozo Garcia, Karla)
January 5, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Karla Del Pozo Garcia on behalf of Snap-On Incorporated..(Del Pozo Garcia, Karla)
December 27, 2021 Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Snap-On Incorporated served on 12/15/2021, answer due 1/5/2022. Service was accepted by Robin Hutt-Banks, Agent. Document filed by Yensy Contreras..(Charo, Jarrett)
December 1, 2021 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Snap-On Incorporated..(jgo)
December 1, 2021 Case Designated ECF. (jgo)
December 1, 2021 Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo)
December 1, 2021 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge J. Paul Oetken. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo)
November 30, 2021 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Snap-On Incorporated, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Yensy Contreras..(Charo, Jarrett)
November 30, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Charo, Jarrett)
November 30, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Snap-On Incorporated. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25401310)Document filed by Yensy Contreras..(Charo, Jarrett)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Contreras v. Snap-On Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yensy Contreras
Represented By: Jarrett Scott Charo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Snap-On Incorporated
Represented By: Karla Del Pozo Garcia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?