Contreras v. RJR Vapor Co., LLC
| Yensy Contreras |
| RJR Vapor Co., LLC |
| 1:2021cv10201 |
| December 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Gregory H Woods |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. RJR Vapor Co., LLC served on 12/20/2021, answer due 2/9/2022. Service was accepted by Colleen Walsh, Agent. Document filed by Yensy Contreras..(Charo, Jarrett) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. Application granted. The deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to February 9, 2022. The initial pretrial conference, currently scheduled for March 3, 2022, is adjourned to April 13, 2022 at 3:00 p.m. In accordance with the Court's December 2, 2021 Order, Dkt. No. 6, the parties are directed to participate in mediation at least two weeks prior to the initial pretrial conference. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion currently pending at Dkt. No. 8. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 1/6/2022) (js)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: RJR Vapor Co., LLC answer due 2/9/2022., Set/Reset Hearings:( Initial Conference set for 4/13/2022 at 03:00 PM before Judge Gregory H. Woods.) (js) |
| Filing 8 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to the complaint and for adjournment of initial conference addressed to Judge Gregory H. Woods from Harold K. Gordon dated January 4, 2022. Document filed by RJR Vapor Co., LLC..(Gordon, Harold) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Harold Keith Gordon on behalf of RJR Vapor Co., LLC..(Gordon, Harold) |
|
Filing 6
MEDIATION REFERRAL ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that this case is referred for mediation to the Court-annexed Mediation Program. The parties are hereby notified that Local Rule 83.9 shall govern the mediation and are directed to participate in the mediation in good faith. The mediation should take place at least two weeks prior to the Initial Pretrial Conference, which has been scheduled for March 3, 2022 at 3:30 p.m. by separate order to be entered today. The mediation will have no effect upon any scheduling order issued by this Court without leave of this Court. Please reference the following when corresponding with the Mediation Office. E-mail MediationOffice@nysd.uscourts.gov, telephone (212) 805-0643, and facsimile (212) 805-0647. Mediator to be Assigned by 12/13/2021. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 12/2/2021) (rro)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 3/3/2022 at 03:30 PM before Judge Gregory H. Woods. The conference will be conducted by telephone. The parties are directed to the Court's Emergency Rules in Light of COVID-19, which are available on the Court's website, for the dial-in number and other relevant instructions. The parties are specifically directed to comply with Rule 2(C) of the Court's Emergency Rules. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 12/2/2021) (rro) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to RJR Vapor Co., LLC..(gp) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Gregory H. Woods. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(gp) |
| Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (gp) |
| Case Designated ECF. (gp) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to RJR Vapor Co., LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Yensy Contreras..(Charo, Jarrett) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Charo, Jarrett) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RJR Vapor Co., LLC. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25406805)Document filed by Yensy Contreras..(Charo, Jarrett) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Contreras v. RJR Vapor Co., LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Yensy Contreras | |
| Represented By: | Jarrett Scott Charo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: RJR Vapor Co., LLC | |
| Represented By: | Harold Keith Gordon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
