Langel v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
| JESSE LANGEL |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv10234 |
| December 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Andrew L Carter |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 COMPLAINT against Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.. Document filed by Jesse Langel..(Langel, Jesse) |
| Filing 6 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - PDF ERROR - COMPLAINT against Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.. Document filed by Jesse Langel.(Langel, Jesse) Modified on 1/4/2022 (vf). |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Jesse Dennis Langel to RE-FILE Document No. #5 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): PDF ERROR; the PDF for the pleading is not viewable; the wrong party/parties whom the pleading is against were selected. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Jesse Dennis Langel to RE-FILE Document No. #6 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s):PDF ERROR, the PDF for the pleading is not viewable. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (vf) |
| Filing 5 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - PDF ERROR - COMPLAINT against Jesse Langel. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25522728)Document filed by Jesse Langel..(Langel, Jesse) Modified on 1/4/2022 (vf). |
Filing 4
ORDER granting in part and denying in part #3 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. Application GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. If Defendant intends to move to dismiss, it shall file a pre-motion conference letter with the Court in accordance with my Individual Practices. The Court will set a briefing schedule for any motion to dismiss at that time. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 12/8/2021) (ate)
|
| Filing 3 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time for pleading and briefing schedule addressed to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. from Garrett D. Kennedy dated December 7, 2021. Document filed by Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc...(Kennedy, Garrett) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to Attorney Garrett Kennedy. Attorney must electronically file the Civil Cover Sheet. Use the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents. (gp) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(gp) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (gp) |
| Case Designated ECF. (gp) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Other Affiliate Vanguard Group, Inc. for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.. Document filed by Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc...(Kennedy, Garrett) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from New York Supreme Court, County of New York. Case Number: 159656/2021. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25408893).Document filed by Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A- Summons with Notice, #3 Exhibit B- POS on 11.1.2021, #4 Exhibit C- Statement of Authorization for Electronic Filing, #5 Exhibit D- Demand for Complaint).(Kennedy, Garrett) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Langel v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JESSE LANGEL | |
| Represented By: | Jesse Dennis Langel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Garrett David Kennedy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
