Gannaway v. The People of New York, NY
| Shakur D. Gannaway |
| The people of New York, NY |
| 1:2021cv10314 |
| December 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 cn |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 LETTER from S. Gannaway, dated 1/13/22 re: I am time-barred and have not been appointed any assistance with these complex issues. I explained that I have direct evidence, and I filed pro se etc. I sent you the grievance which I filed about government interference, and you still ignored that and denied my extension and the chance to appoint me some help. Document filed by Shakur D. Gannaway.(sc) |
| Mailed a copy of #7 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File to Shakur D. Gannaway, ID: JR6873 at S.C.I. Camp Hill, P.O. Box 8837, 2500 Lisburn Road, Camp Hill, PA 17001. (kh) |
Filing 7
ORDER denying #4 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Notice of Appeal. The Court denies Petitioner's motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal (ECF 4) as unnecessary because Petitioner's notice of appeal is timely. The Court construes Petitioner's "objection to[] order of dismissal" (ECF 6) as a motion for relief under Rules 59(e) and 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as well as for relief under Local Civil Rule 6.3, and the Court denies that motion as well. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to mail a copy of this order to Petitioner and note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 1/5/2022) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re: #5 Notice of Appeal. (tp) |
| Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Appeal Electronic Files for #5 Notice of Appeal filed by Shakur D. Gannaway were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (tp) |
| Filing 6 OBJECTION TO ORDER OF DISMISSAL, re: #2 Order of Dismissal. Document filed by Shakur D. Gannaway. (sc) Modified on 1/4/2022 (nb). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEAL from #2 Order of Dismissal, #3 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Petition). Document filed by Shakur D. Gannaway. Form D-P is due within 14 days to the Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. (tp) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal. Document filed by Shakur D. Gannaway. (tp) |
| Appeal Remark as to #5 Notice of Appeal filed by Shakur D. Gannaway. IFP DENIED 12/06/2021. (tp) |
| Appeal Fee Due: for #5 Notice of Appeal. Appeal fee due by 1/11/2022. (tp) |
| Mailed a copy of #2 Order of Dismissal, #3 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Petition), and Notice of Appeal Instructions to Shakur D. Gannaway, ID: JR6873 at S.C.I. Camp Hill, Smart Communication (P.A.D.O.C), K-Block/28 Cell, P.O. Box 33028, St. Petersburg, FL 33733. (kh) |
|
Filing 3
CIVIL JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the order issued December 6, 2021, dismissing this action without prejudice as duplicative, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this action is dismissed without prejudice to the pending action under docket number 1:21-CV-7674. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Petitioner, a Pennsylvania state prisoner, and note service on the docket. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 12/6/21) (Attachments: #1 PRO SE APPEAL PACKAGE) (rdz) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court dismisses this action without prejudice as duplicative. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Court directs the Clerk of Court to mail a copy of this order to Petitioner (who is incarcerated in a Pennsylvania state correctional institution but whose address of record is a post-office box in St. Petersburg, Florida) and note service on the docket. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 12/6/21) (rdz) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(bcu) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS. Document filed by Shakur D. Gannaway. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gannaway v. The People of New York, NY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Shakur D. Gannaway | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: The people of New York, NY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
