Mickles v. Southern District of Alabama (Mobile, AL) et al
| Terrell E. Mickles |
| Southern District of Alabama (Mobile, AL), Baldwin County Circuit Court (Bay Minette, AL), Foley Municipal Court (Foley, AL), Escambia County Circuity Court (Pensacola, FL), Western District of Missouri (Springfield, Missouri), Twentieth Circuit Court of Collier County (Naples, FL), Western District of Luisiana (New Orleans, Louisiana), Eastern District of Atlanta District Court (Athens, GA), Western District of Texas District Court (Midland, TX) and Southern District of New York (New York, NY) |
| 1:2021cv10318 |
| December 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Mailed a copy of #2 Order of Dismissal to Terrell E. Mickles, ID: 11733-003 at FCI Terre Haute, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, P.O. Box 33, Terre Haute, IN 47808. (kh) |
Filing 3
CIVIL JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the order issued December 6, 2021, dismissing this action without prejudice, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this action is dismissed without prejudice under the Prison Litigation Reform Act's "three- strikes" rule. 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Plaintiff continues to be barred from filing any federal civil action under the in forma pauperis statute while he is a prisoner unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See id. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 12/6/21) (Attachments: #1 PRO SE APPEAL PACKAGE) (rdz)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1915(g): The Court denies Plaintiff IFP status and dismisses this action without prejudice under the PLRA's "three- strikes" rule. 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Plaintiff remains barred from filing any future federal civil action IFP while he is a prisoner, unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Court directs the Clerk of Court to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 12/6/21) (rdz) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(bcu) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Baldwin County Circuit Court (Bay Minette, AL), Eastern District of Atlanta District Court (Athens, GA), Escambia County Circuity Court (Pensacola, FL), Foley Municipal Court (Foley, AL), Southern District of Alabama (Mobile, AL), Southern District of New York (New York, NY), Twentieth Circuit Court of Collier County (Naples, FL), Western District of Luisiana (New Orleans, Louisiana), Western District of Missouri (Springfield, Missouri), Western District of Texas District Court (Midland, TX). Document filed by Terrell E. Mickles. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
