Tavarez-Vargas v. Logitech Inc.
Carmen Tavarez-Vargas |
Logitech Inc. |
1:2021cv10401 |
December 6, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Paul A Engelmayer |
Robert W Lehrburger |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Logitech Inc. served on 1/11/2022, answer due 2/1/2022. Service was accepted by Jane Doe, Receptionist. Document filed by Carmen Tavarez-Vargas..(Kroub, Edward) |
Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement). Referred to Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger. The parties are hereby notified that this Court has written on a legal issue that appears central to this case: the applicability of the ADA to websites. See Del-Orden v. Bonobos, Inc., No. 17 Civ. 2744 (PAE), 2017 WL 6547902 (S.D.N.Y. Dec 20, 2017). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 12/7/2021) (vfr) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Logitech Inc...(pc) |
Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is so redesignated. (aea) |
Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Logitech Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Carmen Tavarez-Vargas..(Kroub, Edward) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Kroub, Edward) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Logitech Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25428234)Document filed by Carmen Tavarez-Vargas..(Kroub, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Tavarez-Vargas v. Logitech Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Carmen Tavarez-Vargas | |
Represented By: | Edward Y. Kroub |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Logitech Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.