Protzek, Jr. v. Dawson Geophysical Company et al
Plaintiff: William Protzek, Jr.
Defendant: Dawson Geophysical Company, Stephen C. Jumper, Craig W. Cooper, Michael L. Klofas, Ted R. North and Mark A. Vander Ploeg
Case Number: 1:2021cv10407
Filed: December 6, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Vernon S Broderick
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2022 Filing 17 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) Craig W. Cooper, Dawson Geophysical Company, Stephen C. Jumper, Michael L. Klofas, Ted R. North, Mark A. Vander Ploeg. Document filed by William Protzek, Jr.. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Monteverde, Juan)
March 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER: Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that, no later than March 8, 2022, Plaintiff shall submit a letter of no more than three (3) pages, supported by legal authority, demonstrating good cause as to why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). "Good cause is generally found only in exceptional circumstances where the plaintiff's failure to serve process in a timely manner was the result of circumstances beyond its control." E. Refractories Co. v. Forty Eight Insulations, Inc., 187 F.R.D. 503, 505 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) (internal quotation marks omitted). "District courts consider the diligence of plaintiff's efforts to effect proper service and any prejudice suffered by the defendant as a consequence of the delay." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). "An attorney's inadvertence, neglect, mistake or misplaced reliance does not constitute good cause. Howard v. Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler, 977 F.Supp. 654, 658 (S.D.N.Y.1997) (citing McGregor v. United States, 933 F.2d 156, 160 (2d Cir.1991), aff'd, 173 F.3d 844 (2d Cir.1999)). Plaintiff is warned that failure to submit a letter and to demonstrate good cause for failure to serve Defendants within ninety days after the complaint was filed will result in dismissal of this action. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 3/1/2022) (kv)
January 5, 2022 Filing 15 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Mark A. Vander Ploeg..(sj)
January 5, 2022 Filing 14 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Ted R. North..(sj)
January 5, 2022 Filing 13 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Michael L. Klofas..(sj)
January 5, 2022 Filing 12 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Stephen C. Jumper..(sj)
January 5, 2022 Filing 11 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Craig W. Cooper..(sj)
January 5, 2022 Filing 10 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Dawson Geophysical Company..(sj)
January 4, 2022 Filing 9 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Mark A. Vander Ploeg, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by William Protzek, Jr...(Monteverde, Juan)
January 4, 2022 Filing 8 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Ted R. North, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by William Protzek, Jr...(Monteverde, Juan)
January 4, 2022 Filing 7 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Michael L. Klofas, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by William Protzek, Jr...(Monteverde, Juan)
January 4, 2022 Filing 6 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Stephen C. Jumper, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by William Protzek, Jr...(Monteverde, Juan)
January 4, 2022 Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Craig W. Cooper, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by William Protzek, Jr...(Monteverde, Juan)
January 4, 2022 Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Dawson Geophysical Company, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by William Protzek, Jr...(Monteverde, Juan)
December 7, 2021 Case Designated ECF. (pc)
December 7, 2021 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Unassigned. .(pc)
December 7, 2021 CASE REFERRED TO Judge Vernon S. Broderick as possibly related to 21cv9064. (pc)
December 7, 2021 CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:21-cv-09064-VSB. Notice of Assignment to follow. (aea)
December 7, 2021 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Vernon S. Broderick. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (aea)
December 7, 2021 Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (aea)
December 6, 2021 Filing 3 STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 1:21-cv-09064. Document filed by William Protzek, Jr...(Monteverde, Juan)
December 6, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Monteverde, Juan)
December 6, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Craig W. Cooper, Dawson Geophysical Company, Stephen C. Jumper, Michael L. Klofas, Ted R. North, Mark A. Vander Ploeg. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25428912)Document filed by William Protzek, Jr...(Monteverde, Juan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Protzek, Jr. v. Dawson Geophysical Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Protzek, Jr.
Represented By: Juan Eneas Monteverde
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dawson Geophysical Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephen C. Jumper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Craig W. Cooper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael L. Klofas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ted R. North
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark A. Vander Ploeg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?