FritzCo LLC et al v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al
| FritzCo LLC, Los Gatos-Saratoga Community Education and Recreation and The Law Office of Samuel M. Smith |
| Verizon Communications Inc. and Cellco Partnership doing business as Verizon Wireless |
| 1:2021cv10432 |
| December 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| J Paul Oetken |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
MOTION for Catherine Pratsinakis to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number CNYSDC-25687749. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by FritzCo LLC, Los Gatos-Saratoga Community Education and Recreation, The Law Office of Samuel M. Smith. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Certificate of Service).(Pratsinakis, Catherine)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER granting #16 PLAINTIFFS' UNOPPOSED MOTION TO MAINTAIN SEAL OF THE UNREDACTED COMPLAINT: HEREBY ORDERED: Plaintiffs' Motion is GRANTED; and The Clerk of Court shall maintain UNDER SEAL Plaintiffs' unredacted Complaint filed on December 7, 2021, with viewing restricted to the parties and the Court only. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 1/31/2022) (js) Transmission to Sealed Records Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing 17
***SELECTED PARTIES*** MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #16 MOTION to Maintain Seal of the Unredacted Complaint (Unopposed). . Document filed by FritzCo LLC, Los Gatos-Saratoga Community Education and Recreation, The Law Office of Samuel M. Smith, Cellco Partnership, Verizon Communications Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Yonit A. Caplow, #2 Exhibit A - Agreement)Motion or Order to File Under Seal: #16 .(Caplow, Yonit)
|
|
Filing 16
MOTION to Maintain Seal of the Unredacted Complaint (Unopposed). Document filed by FritzCo LLC, Los Gatos-Saratoga Community Education and Recreation, The Law Office of Samuel M. Smith. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service).(Caplow, Yonit)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #13 Letter Motion for Extension of Time: GRANTED. DEFENDANTS SHALL ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE FEBRUARY 7, 2022. SO ORDERED. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge J. Paul Oetken)(Text Only Order) (Oetken, J.)
|
|
Filing 14
RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Verizon Communications Inc. for Cellco Partnership. Document filed by Cellco Partnership, Verizon Communications Inc...(Ostrower, Silvia)
|
|
Filing 13
LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time for Defendants Verizon Communications Inc. and Cellco Partnership (Verizon) respond to plaintiffs complaint through and including Monday, February 7, 2022 addressed to Judge J. Paul Oetken from Silvia Noemi Ostrower dated December 28, 2021. Document filed by Cellco Partnership, Verizon Communications Inc...(Ostrower, Silvia)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Silvia Noemi Ostrower on behalf of Cellco Partnership, Verizon Communications Inc...(Ostrower, Silvia)
|
|
Filing 11
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Summons and Complaint, served. Verizon Communications Inc. served on 12/16/2021, answer due 1/6/2022. Service was accepted by Paula Castro, Intake Specialist. Document filed by FritzCo LLC; Los Gatos-Saratoga Community Education and Recreation; The Law Office of Samuel M. Smith..(Glauber, Ira)
|
|
Filing 10
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Summons and Complaint, served. Cellco Partnership served on 12/16/2021, answer due 1/6/2022. Service was accepted by Joyce Kimanzi, Agent in Charge. Document filed by FritzCo LLC; Los Gatos-Saratoga Community Education and Recreation; The Law Office of Samuel M. Smith..(Glauber, Ira)
|
|
Filing 9
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Verizon Communications Inc.. (vf)
|
|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Cellco Partnership. (vf)
|
|
Filing 7
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Verizon Communications Inc., re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by FritzCo LLC, Los Gatos-Saratoga Community Education and Recreation, The Law Office of Samuel M. Smith..(Glauber, Ira)
|
|
Filing 6
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to CellCo Partnership (d/b/a Verizon Wireless), re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by FritzCo LLC, Los Gatos-Saratoga Community Education and Recreation, The Law Office of Samuel M. Smith..(Glauber, Ira)
|
|
Filing 5
RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by FritzCo LLC, Los Gatos-Saratoga Community Education and Recreation, The Law Office of Samuel M. Smith..(Glauber, Ira)
|
|
Filing 4
SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault..(jus)
|
|
Filing 3
DOCUMENTS TO BE SEALED (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/30/2021) (pc)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(pc) (gp).
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Cellco Partnership, Verizon Communications Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number 465401290249)Document filed by FritzCo LLC, Los Gatos-Saratoga Community Education and Recreation, The Law Office of Samuel M. Smith..(pc) (gp).
|
|
Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc)
|
|
ORDER REDACTING PLEADING FILED IN 21MC833..(pc)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (pc)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
