Beitmirza v. Elymar Restaurant Corporation et al
| Rumseen Beitmirza |
| Elymar Restaurant Corporation, Elyane Vaschetta (a/k/a Elyane Bruno), William Welles, Elyane Vaschetta and Elyane Bruno |
| 1:2021cv10567 |
| December 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| J Paul Oetken |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER granting #18 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: GRANTED. DEFENDANTS SHALL HAVE UNTIL MARCH 11, 2022, TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT. SO ORDERED. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge J. Paul Oetken)(Text Only Order) (ja)
|
| Filing 18 SECOND LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or otherwise respond addressed to Judge J. Paul Oetken from Ryan W. Lawler dated January 24, 2022. Document filed by Elymar Restaurant Corporation, Elyane Vaschetta, William Welles..(Lawler, Ryan) |
| Filing 17 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Elyane Vaschetta served on 1/11/2022, answer due 2/1/2022. Document filed by Rumseen Beitmirza(on behalf of himself)..(Levin-Epstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 16 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Elyane Vaschetta served on 1/6/2022, answer due 1/27/2022. Document filed by Rumseen Beitmirza(on behalf of himself)..(Levin-Epstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 15 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. William Welles served on 12/23/2021, answer due 1/13/2022. Document filed by Rumseen Beitmirza(on behalf of himself)..(Levin-Epstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. William Welles served on 1/11/2022, answer due 2/1/2022. Document filed by Rumseen Beitmirza(on behalf of himself)..(Levin-Epstein, Joshua) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #11 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: GRANTED. DEFENDANTS SHALL RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT BY FEBRUARY 11, 2022. SO ORDERED. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge J. Paul Oetken)(Text Only Order) (ja)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Alex Otchy on behalf of Elymar Restaurant Corporation, Elyane Vaschetta, William Welles..(Otchy, Alex) |
| Filing 11 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge J. Paul Oetken from Ryan W. Lawler dated January 11, 2022. Document filed by Elymar Restaurant Corporation, Elyane Vaschetta, William Welles. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Stipulation).(Lawler, Ryan) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Ryan William Lawler on behalf of Elymar Restaurant Corporation, Elyane Vaschetta, William Welles..(Lawler, Ryan) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joshua Levin-Epstein on behalf of Rumseen Beitmirza(on behalf of himself), Rumseen Beitmirza(on behalf of others similarly situated in the proposal FLSA Collective Action)..(Levin-Epstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Elymar Restaurant Corporation served on 12/17/2021, answer due 1/7/2022. Document filed by Rumseen Beitmirza(on behalf of himself); Rumseen Beitmirza(on behalf of others similarly situated in the proposal FLSA Collective Action)..(Levin-Epstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 7 COMPLAINT against Elymar Restaurant Corporation, Elyane Vaschetta, William Welles. Document filed by Rumseen Beitmirza, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated in the proposed FLSA Collective Action..(Mizrahi, Eunon) |
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Elymar Restaurant Corporation, Elyane Vaschetta, William Welles. Document filed by Rumseen Beitmirza..(Mizrahi, Eunon) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Elymar Restaurant Corporation, Elyane Vaschetta, William Welles. (sj) |
| ADD PARTY FOR PLEADING. Plaintiffs/Petitioners Rumseen Beitmirza added. Party added pursuant to #6 Complaint.Document filed by Rumseen Beitmirza. Related document: #6 Complaint..(Mizrahi, Eunon) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Joshua Levin-Epstein. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Rumseen Beitmirza, Elyane Vaschetta. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted; alias party type was entered incorrectly. (sj) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Joshua Levin-Epstein to RE-FILE re: Document No. #1 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): all of the parties listed on the pleading were not entered on CM ECF; Rumseen Beitmirza must be added again with party text 'on behalf of others similarly situated in the proposed FLSA Collective Action; the pleading was not signed by filing attorney. Docket the event type Add Party to Pleading found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents.. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (sj) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge J. Paul Oetken. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Joshua Levin-Epstein. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Jury Demand code n (None); County code Albany. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Jury Demand code has been modified to p (Plaintiff); the County code has been modified to New York. (sj) |
| Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Eunon Jason Mizrahi re: Document No. #6 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): all of the parties listed on the pleading were not entered on CM ECF. Add party Rumseen Beitmirza with party text "and others similarly situated in the proposed FLSA Collective Action". Docket the event type Add Party to Pleading found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents. (vf) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Elymar Restaurant Corporation, Elyane Vaschetta (a/k/a Elyane Bruno), and William Welles, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Rumseen Beitmirza..(Levin-Epstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Levin-Epstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 2 CONSENT TO SUE. Document filed by Rumseen Beitmirza..(Levin-Epstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - SIGNATURE ERROR - COMPLAINT against Elymar Restaurant Corporation, Elyane Vaschetta (a/k/a Elyane Bruno), William Welles. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25450509)Document filed by Rumseen Beitmirza..(Levin-Epstein, Joshua) Modified on 12/13/2021 (sj). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
