Calcano v. Manhattan Funeral Services, Inc.
| Marcos Calcano |
| Manhattan Funeral Services, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv10618 |
| December 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Lewis J Liman |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference by telephone set for 2/25/2022 at 2:00 PM before Judge Lewis J. Liman. Parties are directed to dial into the Court's teleconference number at 888-251-2909, Access Code 2123101, and follow the necessary prompts. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 1/31/2022) (vfr)
|
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Manhattan Funeral Services, Inc. served on 1/10/2022, answer due 1/31/2022. Service was accepted by Nancy Dougherty, NYS SOS, Agent. Document filed by Marcos Calcano..(Gottlieb, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Manhattan Funeral Services, Inc...(gp) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Gottlieb, Dana) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Manhattan Funeral Services, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Marcos Calcano..(Gottlieb, Dana) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Manhattan Funeral Services, Inc.. Document filed by Marcos Calcano..(Gottlieb, Dana) |
| ***DELETED DOCUMENT. Deleted document number #3 Request for Issuance of Summons. The document was incorrectly filed in this case. (vf) |
| Civil Case Opening Fee Paid electronically via Pay.gov: for #1 Complaint. Filing fee $ 402.00. Pay.gov receipt number ANYSDC-25456598, paid on 12/11/2021. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Dana Lauren Gottlieb to RE-FILE Document No. 1 belonging to case 1:21-cv-10589 that was incorrectly filed on 12/11/2021 in case 1:21-cv-10618. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the pleading was filed in the wrong case. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. If the deficiency/deficiencies are not corrected within five (5) days per Amended Standing Order 15-mc-00131 this case will be administratively closed. Initial Pleading due by 12/20/2021. (vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (gp) |
| ***DELETED DOCUMENT. Deleted document number #2 Civil Cover Sheet. The document was incorrectly filed in this case. (vf) |
| Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (gp) |
| ***DELETED DOCUMENT. Deleted document number #1 Complaint. The document was incorrectly filed in this case. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to attorney Dana Lauren Gottlieb to RE-FILE Document No. 2 The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the civil cover sheet was filed in the wrong case. Re-file the document using the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents and attach the correct PDF. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Lewis J. Liman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(gp) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Dana Lauren Gottlieb to RE-FILE Document No. 3 belonging to case 1:21-cv-10589 that was incorrectly filed on 12/11/2021 in case 1:21-cv-10618. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the request for issuance of summons was filed in the wrong case. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (vf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Calcano v. Manhattan Funeral Services, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marcos Calcano | |
| Represented By: | Dana Lauren Gottlieb |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Manhattan Funeral Services, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
