Neita v. MTA Metro-North Railroad
| Ramon Neita |
| MTA Metro-North Railroad |
| 1:2021cv10634 |
| December 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Jesse M Furman |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 151 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint. Document filed by MTA Metro-North Railroad..(Muraidekh, Alan) |
| Filing 8 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by MTA Metro-North Railroad..(Muraidekh, Alan) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to MTA Metro-North Railroad..(gp) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to MTA Metro-North Railroad, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Ramon Neita..(Barkan, Steven) |
| Filing 5 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT - SUMMONS REQUEST As To - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Ramon Neita.(Barkan, Steven) Modified on 12/16/2021 (vf). |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Steven Laurence Barkan to RE-FILE Document No. #5 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Plaintiff party name error in Summons Caption. Party name spelling does not correspond to pleading caption; and Docket Entry Error. Enter the party name as to whom summons is being issued for when prompted. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (vf) |
Filing 4
NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 3/23/2022 at 3:15 PM in Courtroom 1105, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Jesse M. Furman. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 12/15/2021) (vfr)
|
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Steven Laurence Barkan to RE-FILE Document No. #3 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the issuance of summons is not correct; party name error. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (sj) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Steven Laurence Barkan. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Ramon Neita, MTA Metro-North Railroad. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name was entered in all caps; party role was entered incorrectly. (sj) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Jesse M. Furman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Steven Laurence Barkan. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code Albany; Fee Status code due (due). The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to Kings; the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid). (sj) |
| Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj) |
| Filing 3 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT SUMMONS REQUEST - PDF ERROR REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to MtA Metro- North Railroad, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by RAMON NEITA..(Barkan, Steven) Modified on 12/14/2021 (sj). |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Barkan, Steven) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MTA Metro-North Railroad. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25459573)Document filed by RAMON NEITA..(Barkan, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Neita v. MTA Metro-North Railroad | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ramon Neita | |
| Represented By: | Steven Laurence Barkan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MTA Metro-North Railroad | |
| Represented By: | Alan Muraidekh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
