Rivera v. Communication Systems, Inc. et al
Bashir Rivera |
Communication Systems, Inc., Roger H.D. Lacey, Steven C. Webster, Randall D. Sampson, Richard A. Primuth and Michael Zapata |
1:2021cv10637 |
December 13, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Naomi Reice Buchwald |
Securities/Commodities |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(l)(A)(i), plaintiff hereby voluntarily dismisses the above-captioned action (the "Action") without prejudice. Defendants have filed neither an answer nor a motion for summary judgment in the Action. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 2/24/2022) (js) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) Communication Systems, Inc., Roger H.D. Lacey, Richard A. Primuth, Randall D. Sampson, Steven C. Webster, Michael Zapata. Document filed by Bashir Rivera. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Kuehn, Justin) |
Filing 3 LETTER: addressed to Justin Aaron Kuehn from Naomi Reice Buchwald, United States District Judge dated 2/22/2022 re: A review of the docket sheet in the above-captioned matter indicates that your complaint was filed on December 13, 2021, and that, as of today's date, the complaint has not been served on the defendants. Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended as of January 1, 2018, provides: If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court-- on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff-- must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period. Thus, unless you achieve service or can show good cause why your time to serve should be extended, this matter will be dismissed without prejudice on March 14, 2022..(ama) |
Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Kuehn, Justin) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Communication Systems, Inc., Roger H.D. Lacey, Richard A. Primuth, Randall D. Sampson, Steven C. Webster, Michael Zapata. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25460018)Document filed by Bashir Rivera..(Kuehn, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.