Awolowo v. Praxair Technology Inc et al
Rachel Awolowo |
Praxair Technology Inc and Linde Gas & Equipment Inc |
1:2021cv10748 |
December 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
John P Cronan |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 ct |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND. Document filed by Linde Gas & Equipment Inc, Praxair Technology Inc..(White, Keela) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court, County of Bronx. Case Number: 814407/2021E..Document filed by Linde Gas & Equipment Inc, Praxair Technology Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A-Summons & Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex B-Copy of Reg. Mail Envelope, #3 Exhibit Ex C-Notice of Appearance State Court, #4 Exhibit Ex D-Cert of Incorporation, #5 Exhibit Ex E-Email to Plaintiff Atty 12.3.21).(White, Keela) |
Filing 3 SUPPLEMENTAL RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Linde Plc for Linde Gas & Equipment Inc, Praxair Technology Inc. Document filed by Linde Gas & Equipment Inc, Praxair Technology Inc..(White, Keela) |
Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge John P. Cronan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
Civil Case Opening Fee Paid electronically via Pay.gov: for #1 Notice of Removal. Filing fee $ 402.00. Pay.gov receipt number ANYSDC-25474447, paid on 12/15/2021. (vf) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Keela K. White. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Rachel Awolowo, Praxair Technology Inc, Linde Gas & Equipment Inc. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party role was entered incorrectly. (vf) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Keela K. White to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Notice of Removal. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Pursuant to ECF Rule 13.3, you must refile your pleading with exhibits named accordingly. Re-file the pleading using the event type Notice of Removal found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (vf) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(White, Keela) |
Filing 1 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court Bronx County, County of Bronx. Case Number: 814407/2021E..Document filed by Linde Gas & Equipment Inc, Praxair Technology Inc..(White, Keela) Modified on 12/16/2021 (vf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.