Hurt v. United States of America
| Tyrone Hurt |
| United States of America |
| 1:2021cv10781 |
| December 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Appeal Electronic Files for #3 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal filed by Tyrone Hurt were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (tp) |
| Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re: #3 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal. (tp) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL from #2 Order. Document filed by Tyrone Hurt. Form D-P is due within 14 days to the Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. (tp) |
| Appeal Remark as to #3 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal filed by Tyrone Hurt. IFP DENIED 01/07/2022. (tp) |
| Appeal Fee Due: for #3 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal. Appeal fee due by 2/3/2022. (tp) |
Filing 2
ORDER: On October 11, 2013, Plaintiff was barred from filing any new action in forma pauperis ("IFP") without first obtaining leave to file from the Court. See Hurt v. D.C. Bd. of Parole, ECF 1:13-CV-5365, 3 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 11, 2013), appeal dismissed, No. 13-4474 (2d Cir. Apr. 3, 2014). Plaintiff filed this new pro se action without paying the filing fees, submitting an IFP application, or seeking leave to file. Because Plaintiff failed to comply with the October 11, 2013 order in Hurt, ECF 1:13-CV-5365, the Court denies Plaintiff leave to file this action. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 1/7/22) (rdz) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Mailed a copy of #2 Order to Tyrone Hurt at 317 Kentucky Ave. SE, Apt. 2, Washington, DC 20003. (kh) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(bcu) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States of America. Document filed by Tyrone Hurt..(rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hurt v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tyrone Hurt | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
