Best Payphones, Inc. v. Verizon New York, Inc. et al
| Best Payphones, Inc. |
| Verizon New York, Inc. and New York State Public Service Commission |
| 1:2021cv11027 |
| December 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Lewis J Liman |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference by telephone set for 3/16/2022 at 4:30 PM before Judge Lewis J. Liman. Parties are directed to dial into the Court's teleconference number at 888-251-2909, Access Code 2123101, and follow the necessary prompts. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 2/11/2022) (vfr)
|
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Verizon New York, Inc...(pc) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to New York State Public Service Commission..(pc) |
| Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Lewis J. Liman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney David Bolton. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Best Payphones, Inc., Verizon, New York State Public Service Commission. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error; party role was entered incorrectly;. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney David Bolton. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Cause of Action code 05:554; Dollar Demand $9,999,000;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Cause of Action code has been modified to 28:1331; the Dollar Demand has been modified to blank;. (pc) |
| Filing 5 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Best Payphones, Inc...(Bolton, David) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Bolton, David) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to New York State Public Service Commission, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Best Payphones, Inc...(Bolton, David) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Verizon New York, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Best Payphones, Inc...(Bolton, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Verizon, New York State Public Service Commission. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25506749)Document filed by Best Payphones, Inc...(Bolton, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
