In Re: Application of The Liverpool Limited Partnernship
| 1:2021mc00392 |
| May 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Other |
| M 77 Application to have subpoena issued to person living in this district re: action in foreign cou |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
ORDER: The Court denies Petitioner's motion. First, because Petitioner did not raise this request in the substantial briefing that accompanied its application for discovery, it is an inappropriate basis for a motion for relief from a judgm ent. "A motion for reconsideration is not an 'opportunity for making new arguments that could have been previously advanced,' nor is it a substitute for appeal." Peoples v. Fischer, 898 F. Supp. 2d 618, 624 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) (qu oting Associated Press v. U.S. Dep't of Def., 395 F. Supp. 2d 17, 19 (S.D.N.Y. 2005); R.F.M.A.S., Inc. v. Mimi So, 640 F. Supp. 2d 506, 509 (S.D.N.Y. 2009), as further set forth in this Order. The Court DENIES Petitioner's motion. This resolves docket number 41. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/27/2021) (vfr)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER. The parties are ORDERED to filed unredacted copies of their respective briefing on or before December 17, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/6/21) (yv)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER: The Court has been notified that neither party seeks sealing or redactions of the Court's Memorandum Opinion & Order temporarily filed under seal on November 4, 2021. See Dkt. Nos. 40, 45. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to unseal the Memorandum Opinion & Order at Dkt. No. 39. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/23/2021) (vfr) Transmission to Sealed Records Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER: The Court is in receipt of the Petitioner's motion for relief from the Court's November 4, 2021 order denying discovery under 28 U.S.C. § 1782. Dkt. No. 41. Respondent is hereby ORDERED to file a response on or before Novem ber 24, 2021. Per the Court's order dated November 4, 2021, the parties were to indicate by November 5, 2021, whether either seeks sealing or limited redactions of the Court's Opinion. Dkt. No. 38. Respondent notified the Court that it does not seek redactions, Dkt. No. 40, but the Court is not in receipt of a letter from Petitioner. Accordingly, Petitioner is ORDERED to indicate by November 19, 2021, if it seeks sealing or limited redactions and justify any such request by re ference to the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006). If the Court does not receive a letter from Petitioner by November 19, 2021, it will file the Opinion without redactions. SO ORDERED. ( Responses due by 11/24/2021) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/17/2021) (vfr)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER: On April 7, 2021, Petitioner filed an application to conduct discovery for use in foreign proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782. In a Memorandum Opinion & Order temporarily filed under seal, the Court DENIES Petitioner's motio n. The Court will send the temporarily sealed Opinion to the parties. By November 5, 2021, the parties are ORDERED to inform the Court whether either party seeks sealing or limited redactions of the Court's Opinion, justifying any such requ est by reference to the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onandaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006). In addition, both parties filed redacted copies of their underlying briefing without making specific application to the Court. Accordingly, the parties are ORDERED to justify and explain such redactions on or before November 26, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/4/2021) (vfr)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER. Applicant The Liverpool Limited Partnership is hereby ORDERED to serve the application and all supporting papers on Respondent JP Morgan Chase & Co. by May 24, 2021. Applicant shall promptly file proof of service on the public docket. Within t hree days of service, the parties shall confer and propose a briefing schedule. Applicant The Liverpool Limited Partnership is further ORDERED to email unredacted copies of its papers to nathannysdchambers@nysd.uscourts.gov. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 5/18/2021) (rjm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: In Re: Application of The Liverpool Limited Partnernship | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
