Application of Alberto Safra for an Order to take Discovery for use in foreign proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782
Case Number: 1:2021mc00640
Filed: August 6, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: M 77 Application to have subpoena issued to person living in this district re: action in foreign cou

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 76 AMENDED STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material...SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James L. Cott on 2/8/2024) (jca)
October 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 66 STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material...SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James L. Cott on 10/12/2022) (jca)
August 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 63 OPINION AND ORDER re: 59 LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Reply addressed to Magistrate Judge James L. Cott from Matthew J. Porpora dated May 24, 2022. filed by Vicky Safra, 1 MISCELLANEOUS CASE INITIATING DOCUMENT - MOTI ON for Discovery. (Filing Fee $ 49.00, Receipt Number 465401283891) filed by In Re: Application of Alberto Safra for an Order to take Discovery for use in foreign proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782. For the foregoing reasons, Alberto&# 039;s Application pursuant to section 1782 is granted. Alberto is hereby authorized to serve the subpoenas annexed as Exhibit 2 to the declaration of Lucas Bento upon Respondents Drs. Tabar, Diamond, Fuster, Bressman, Mount Sinai Health System, an d Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer. All discovery produced by Respondents is subject to the entry of an appropriate protective order, given the sensitive nature of the discovery that is the subject of the subpoenas. The Clerk is respectfully directed to close Docket No. 1 and mark it as "granted," and to close the letter-motion at Docket No. 59 and mark it as "denied." SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James L. Cott on 8/22/2022) (rro)
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 40 STIPULATION AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties that (i) Respondents and Ms. Safra shall respond to the Application on or before February 9, 2022; and (ii) Petitioner will file his reply, if any, on or before February 23, 2022. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this stipulation may be executed in counterparts and that a facsimile or electronic signature shall have the same binding effect on all parties hereto as an original signature. SO ORDERED. (Responses due by 2/9/2022, Replies due by 2/23/2022.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge James L. Cott on 1/7/2022) (jca)
September 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER granting 18 Motion to Intervene. Considering these factors, the Court has reviewed Vicky Safra's motion to intervene and concludes that she is entitled to intervention as of right. Accordingly, the motion to intervene is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 18. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 9/6/2021) (rro)
September 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER: The Court has received Vicky Safra's August 31, 2021 motion to intervene in this proceeding. Dkt. No. 18. Petitioner is directed to file a response to this motion, if any, by September 8, 2021. SO ORDERED. ( Responses due by 9/8/2021) (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 9/1/2021) (vfr)
August 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER re: 14 Letter, filed by In Re: Application of Alberto Safra for an Order to take Discovery for use in foreign proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782. The Court has received Petitioner Alberto Safra's August 25, 2021 letter regardin g certain redacted information in Petitioner's August 5, 2021 application for an order to take discovery for use in foreign proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782 (the "Application") and supporting materials. Dkt. No. 14. From the letter, the Court understands that prior to this case being transferred to the Court, Petitioner was granted leave to file his Application with certain information redacted. As such, the redactions in the Application and supporting material wi ll be maintained. Petitioner's request to email to the Court's chambers email the unredacted Application, motion to seal the Application, and the prior order granting leave to file the Application in redacted form is granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 8/25/2021) (tg)
August 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: In the Court's August 6, 2021 Order, Dkt. No. 8, the Court noted that Petitioner Alberto Safra's August 5, 2021 application for an order to take discovery for use in foreign proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782 (the &quo t;Application"), Dkt. No. 1, was filed with certain information redacted. The Court instructed Petitioner to submit an application for leave to file the Application and supporting materials in redacted form, and reminded Petitioner of the requirement to file versions of the Application and supporting materials in unredacted form in compliance with the Court's Individual Rules of Practice in Civil Cases, Rule 4(A)(ii), and the Southern District of New York's ECF Rules & Instructions, section 6. While Petitioner has filed unredacted versions of these documents with the Court, it has yet to submit an application for leave to file the Application and supporting materials in redacted form. If Petitioner wishes to maintain these redactions, it must submit an application for leave to do so no later than August 31, 2021. So Ordered. (Motions due by 8/31/2021.) (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 8/24/2021) (js)
August 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: Accordingly, Petitioner is directed to serve the Application and this order on the intended respondents no later than August 13, 2021 and to retain proof of service. Any opposition to the Application must be served no later than August 27, 20 21. Petitioner's reply, if any, is due no later than September 3, 2021. The Court will hold a hearing on the Application on September 13, 2021 at 4:00 p.m. Petitioner and the intended respondents are directed to the Court's Emergency Rule s in Light of COVID-19, which are available on the Court's web page, for the dial-in number and access code and other relevant information. Petitioner and the intended respondents are specifically directed to comply with Rule 2(C) of those rules. And as set forth herein. SO ORDERED., ( Replies due by 9/3/2021.) (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 8/06/2021) (ama)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Application of Alberto Safra for an Order to take Discovery for use in foreign proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?