Contreras v. Concur Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Yensy Contreras
Defendant: Concur Technologies, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv00133
Filed: January 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Edgardo Ramos
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 25, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Concur Technologies, Inc.. Document filed by Yensy Contreras. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Kroub, Edward)
April 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: granting #10 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #10 THIRD LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint with Plaintiff's Counsel's consent from March 31, 2022 to and including April 21, 2022. addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Matthew L. Elkin dated March. The Application is Granted. Concur Technologies, Inc. answer due 4/21/2022. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 4/01/2022) (ama)
March 31, 2022 Filing 10 THIRD LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint with Plaintiff's Counsel's consent from March 31, 2022 to and including April 21, 2022 addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Matthew L. Elkin dated March 31, 2022. Document filed by Concur Technologies, Inc...(Elkin, Matthew)
March 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: granting #8 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #8 SECOND LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint Defendant respectfully requests that the Court extend Defendants time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint from March 2, 2022 to March 31, 2022. The Application is Granted. This Concur Technologies, Inc. answer due 3/31/2022. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 3/01/2022) (ama)
February 28, 2022 Filing 8 SECOND LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint Defendant respectfully requests that the Court extend Defendants time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint from March 2, 2022 to March 31, 2022. This is the second request for an extension. Plaintiff consents to this request. addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Matthew L. Elkin dated February 28, 2022. Document filed by Concur Technologies, Inc...(Elkin, Matthew)
February 16, 2022 Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Concur Technologies, Inc. served on 1/19/2022, answer due 3/2/2022. Service was accepted by Patrick Duffy, Intake Clerk. Document filed by Yensy Contreras..(Kroub, Edward)
February 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint from February 9, 2022 to March 2, 2022 with Plaintiff's Consent. Concur Technologies, Inc. answer due 3/2/2022. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Edgardo Ramos)(Text Only Order) (jar)
February 2, 2022 Filing 5 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint from February 9, 2022 to March 2, 2022 with Plaintiff's Consent addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Matthew L. Elkin dated February 2, 2022. Document filed by Concur Technologies, Inc...(Elkin, Matthew)
January 7, 2022 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Concur Technologies, Inc...(pc)
January 7, 2022 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Edgardo Ramos. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc)
January 7, 2022 Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc)
January 7, 2022 Case Designated ECF. (pc)
January 6, 2022 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Concur Technologies, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Yensy Contreras..(Kroub, Edward)
January 6, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Kroub, Edward)
January 6, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Concur Technologies, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25551468)Document filed by Yensy Contreras..(Kroub, Edward)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Contreras v. Concur Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yensy Contreras
Represented By: Edward Y. Kroub
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Concur Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew Lawrence Elkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?