Mercer v. LL 1361 Lexington Avenue LLC
| Stacey Mercer |
| Lex90 Corp. a New York corporation, doing business as Corrado, LL 1361 Lexington Avenue LLC and Le Bon NY Corp. |
| 1:2022cv00427 |
| January 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Analisa Torres |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Le Bon NY Corp.. (vf) |
| Filing 13 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Le Bon NY Corp., re: #12 Amended Complaint. Document filed by Stacey Mercer..(Klein, Nolan) |
| Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #1 Complaint against LL 1361 Lexington Avenue LLC, Le Bon NY Corp..Document filed by Stacey Mercer. Related document: #1 Complaint..(Klein, Nolan) |
Filing 11
NOTICE OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT, LEX90 CORP., ONLY: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff, STACEY MERCER, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files this Notice of Partial Dismissal without Prejudice as to Defendant, LEX90 CORP., only. The Clerk of Court is directed to amend the caption to remove Defendant Lex90 Corp. only, and terminate Defendant Lex90 Corp. from this case. SO ORDERED. Lex90 Corp. (a New York corporation, ) terminated. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 2/15/2022) (kv)
|
| ***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. #10 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Analisa Torres for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. (nd) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) Lex90 Corp.. Document filed by Stacey Mercer. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Klein, Nolan) |
| Magistrate Judge Jennifer Willis is so redesignated. (sjo) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. (as further set forth herein). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 2/3/2022) (kv)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER: To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 2/3/2022) (kv)
|
|
Filing 7
INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to submit a joint letter and a jointly proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order by April 4, 2022, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the instructions set forth below. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 2/3/2022) (kv)
|
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to LL 1361 Lexington Avenue LLC..(pc) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Lex90 Corp...(pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
| Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Klein, Nolan) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Lex90 Corp., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Stacey Mercer..(Klein, Nolan) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to LL 1361 Lexington Avenue LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Stacey Mercer..(Klein, Nolan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LL 1361 Lexington Avenue LLC, Lex90 Corp.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25596402)Document filed by Stacey Mercer..(Klein, Nolan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
