Best Brands Consumer Products Inc. v. Dennis Johnson
| Best Brands Consumer Products Inc. |
| Dennis Johnson |
| 1:2022cv00656 |
| January 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Lewis A Kaplan |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 dj Declaratory Judgment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Dennis Johnson. Document filed by Best Brands Consumer Products Inc.. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Cohen, Morris) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL. Notice to Attorney Cohen, Morris. RE-FILE Document No. #9 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal,,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the stipulation of voluntary dismissal was not signed by the defendant's counsel. Re-file the document using the event type Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal found under the event list Other Documents - select the correct filer/filers - select the correct party/parties the voluntary dismissal is against - and attach the correct signed (scanned signature image) PDF. (nd) |
| Filing 9 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - SIGNATURE ERROR - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Dennis Johnson and without costs pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Best Brands Consumer Products Inc.. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Cohen, Morris) Modified on 2/23/2022 (nd). |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL. Notice to Attorney Cohen, Morris. RE-FILE Document No. #8 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal,,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the stipulation of voluntary dismissal was not signed (ink signatures) by all parties who have appeared;. Re-file the document using the event type Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal found under the event list Other Documents - select the correct filer/filers - select the correct party/parties the voluntary dismissal is against - and attach the correct signed (scanned signature image) PDF. (nd) |
| Filing 8 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - SIGNATURE ERROR - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Dennis Johnson and without costs. Document filed by Best Brands Consumer Products Inc.. Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff...(Cohen, Morris) Modified on 2/18/2022 (nd). |
Filing 7
ORDER RE SCHEDULING AND INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: This action having been assigned to me for all purposes, it is hereby, ORDERED as follows: Counsel receiving this order shall promptly mail copies hereof to all other counsel of record or, in the case of parties for which no appearance has been made, to such parties. Counsel for all parties are directed to confer regarding an agreed scheduling order. If counsel are able to agree on a schedule and the agreed schedule calls for filing of the pretrial order not more than six (6) months from the date of this order, counsel shall sign and file by 3/3/2022 a consent order in the form annexed for consideration by the Court. If such a consent order is not filed within the time provided, a video-conference invite will be emailed to counsel setting a video-conference on 3/10/2022 at 11:40 AM. Any party desiring a conference with the Court for purposes of discussing settlement, narrowing of issues, or other pertinent pretrial matters may request a conference by letter. Counsel should be aware that this case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing(ECF). It is the responsibility of counsel to become familiar with and follow ECF procedures. Information regarding the ECF system can be found on the Courts website at www.nysd.uscourts.gov. So Ordered. Initial Conference set for 3/10/2022 at 11:40 AM before Judge Lewis A. Kaplan. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 2/4/2022) (js)
|
| Filing 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Goldberg, Lee) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Dennis Johnson. (vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Lewis A. Kaplan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Lee A. Goldberg. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code New York. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to XX Out of State. (vf) |
| Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Dennis Johnson, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Best Brands Consumer Products Inc...(Goldberg, Lee) |
| Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Best Brands Consumer Products Inc...(Goldberg, Lee) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Goldberg, Lee) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dennis Johnson. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25635769)Document filed by Best Brands Consumer Products Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C).(Goldberg, Lee) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Best Brands Consumer Products Inc. v. Dennis Johnson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Best Brands Consumer Products Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Lee A. Goldberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dennis Johnson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
