Jiang v. Mayorkas et al
| Wenbin Jiang |
| Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Timothy Houghton and Deputy Director Scott Velez |
| 1:2022cv00671 |
| January 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Jesse M Furman |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jacqueline Roman on behalf of Timothy Houghton, Alejandro Mayorkas, Scott Velez..(Roman, Jacqueline) |
| Magistrate Judge Jennifer Willis is so redesignated. (laq) |
Filing 7
ORDER re: #6 Order for Initial Pretrial Conference. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order and the Court's January 27, 2022 Order, ECF No. 6, to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 1/31/2022) (kv) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Mailed a copy of #6 Order for Initial Pretrial Conference, #7 Order to Wenbin Jiang at 112 Bowery, #702, New York, NY 10013. (kh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 7/26/2022 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom 1105, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Jesse M. Furman. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 1/27/2022) (tg) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus, served. Alejandro Mayorkas, served on 1/26/2022, answer due 3/28/2022. Service was made by Mail, to U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, 26 Federal Plaza, New York, NY 10278; Secretary of DHS, Office of General Counsel, U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security Mail Stop 3650, Washington, DC 20258; and U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, 86 Chambers St., NY,NY 10007. Document filed by Wenbin Jiang. (sc) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus, served. Timothy Houghton, served on 1/26/2022, answer due 3/28/2022. Service was made by Mail, to U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, 26 Federal Plaza, New York, NY 10278; Secretary of DHS, Office of General Counsel, U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, Mail Stop 3650, Washington, DC 20528; and U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Document filed by Wenbin Jiang. (sc) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus served. Scott Velez served on 1/26/2022, answer due 3/28/2022. Service was made by Mail, to U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, 26 Federal Plaza, New York, NY 10278; Secretary of DHS, Office of General Counsel, U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, Stop 3650, Wash., DC 20528; and U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Document filed by Wenbin Jiang. (sc) |
| Filing 1 PETITION IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Timothy Houghton, Alejandro Mayorkas, Scott Velez (Filing Fee $402.00, Receipt Number 465401292695). Document filed by Wenbin Jiang. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Timothy Houghton, Alejandro Mayorkas, Scott Velez, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (sac) |
| Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
