Santos v. Blistex, Inc.
Plaintiff: Michael Santos
Defendant: Blistex, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv00806
Filed: January 31, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Naomi Reice Buchwald
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity Action
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 15, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Blistex, Inc.. Document filed by Michael Santos. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Obergfell, Andrew)
February 1, 2022 Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Blistex, Inc. waiver sent on 2/1/2022, answer due 4/4/2022. Document filed by Michael Santos..(Obergfell, Andrew)
February 1, 2022 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Blistex, Inc.. (sj)
February 1, 2022 Case Designated ECF. (sj)
February 1, 2022 Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj)
February 1, 2022 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj)
February 1, 2022 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Andrew Obergfell. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Michael Santos. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted. (sj)
January 31, 2022 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Blistex Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Michael Santos..(Obergfell, Andrew)
January 31, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Obergfell, Andrew)
January 31, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Blistex, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25659195)Document filed by Michael Santos. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B).(Obergfell, Andrew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Santos v. Blistex, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Santos
Represented By: Andrew Obergfell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Blistex, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?