Roku Inc. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A hereto
Plaintiff: Roku Inc.
Defendant: The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A hereto, Occopa Direct, ENWShop (8), XL GAMES (41), eStarpro (10), Fancer (13), JRSMART (18), Moose Store (29), Mumuyu (30) and MonsterKing (27)
Case Number: 1:2022cv00850
Filed: February 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Lewis J Liman
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,. Document filed by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A hereto..(Borges, Deborah)
April 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 39 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A hereto..(Borges, Deborah)
March 25, 2022 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. #38 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Lewis J. Liman for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. (tp)
March 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 38 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) eStarpro (10), Fancer (13), JRSMART (18), Moose Store (29), Mumuyu (30), MonsterKing (27). Document filed by Roku Inc.. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Tom, Christopher)
March 2, 2022 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. #36 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Lewis J. Liman for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety;. (nd)
March 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 37 LETTER addressed to Judge Lewis J. Liman from Christopher Tom dated March 1, 2022 re: Preliminary Injunction Decision. Document filed by Roku Inc...(Tom, Christopher)
February 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Lewis J. Liman: Preliminary Injunction Hearing held on 2/28/2022 by Telephone Conference. Christopher Tom present by telephone for Plaintiff. Steven Fairchild and Deborah Borges present by telephone for Defendants. Court reporter present by telephone. The Court heard from all parties regarding Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction. Matter taken under advisement, decision reserved by the Court. Plaintiff directed to order a copy of the transcript of the hearing. (mf)
February 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 36 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) XL GAMES (41). Document filed by Roku Inc.. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Tom, Christopher)
February 28, 2022 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. #33 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Lewis J. Liman for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. (tp)
February 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 35 BRIEF re: #31 Opposition Brief Plaintiff's Reply Memorandum in Support of Application for Entry of Preliminary Injunction. Document filed by Roku Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Schedule A).(Tom, Christopher)
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 34 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Summons, Complaint, Order to Show Cause and Order (Dkt. #16) and Order (Dkt. #27) on February 23, 2022. Document filed by Roku Inc...(Tom, Christopher)
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 33 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) ENWShop (8). Document filed by Roku Inc.. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Tom, Christopher)
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER: A hearing on the preliminary injunction motion is scheduled for Monday, February 28, 2022. The Court has received an amended opposition brief to the motion. It is hereby ORDERED that any reply brief shall be filed on ECF no later than 5:00p.m. on Saturday, February 26, 2022. SO ORDERED. (Replies due by 2/26/2022.) (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 2/25/2022) (jca)
February 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 31 SECOND OPPOSITION BRIEF re: #26 Opposition Brief,,, . Document filed by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A hereto..(Borges, Deborah)
February 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER granting #29 Motion for Harry J. Moren to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Lewis J. Liman)(Text Only Order) (ra) Transmission to Attorney Services/Help Desk.
February 23, 2022 Opinion or Order >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #29 MOTION for Harry J. Moren to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee $200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-25765794. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
February 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MOTION for Harry J. Moren to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee $200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-25765794. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Roku Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (Affidavit), #2 Exhibit 2 (Certificate of Good Standing), #3 Exhibit 3 (Text of Proposed Pro Hac Vice Order)).(Moren, Harry)
February 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER granting #19 Motion for Deborah Borges to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Lewis J. Liman)(Text Only Order) (kc) Transmission to Attorney Services/Help Desk.
February 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER granting #20 SECOND LETTER addressed to Judge Lewis J. Liman from Christopher Tom dated February 15, 2022 re: Seven (7) Day Extension Request filed by Roku Inc. Defendants time to respond to the Order is exended to February 24, 2022. The Preliminary Injunction hearing is rescheduled to February 28, 2022 at 2:00PM. The hearing will proceed remotely by telephone and parties are directed to dial into the Court's teleconference line at 888-251-2909 and use access code 2123101. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Lewis J. Liman) (Text Only Order) (mf)
February 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Set/Reset Hearings: Preliminary Injunction Hearing set for 2/28/2022 at 02:00 PM before Judge Lewis J. Liman. (mf)
February 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 26 OPPOSITION BRIEF re: #5 Proposed Order to Show Cause With Emergency Relief, #6 Memorandum of Law in Support of proposed preliminary injunction. Document filed by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A hereto. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction, #2 Affidavit By Qihuang Yao In Support of Defendant's Motion to Deny, #3 Affidavit By Yanyan Ding In Support of Defendant's Motion to Deny, #4 Affidavit By Dandan He In Support of Defendant's Motion to Deny, #5 Affidavit By Qihuang Yao In Support of Defendant's Motion to Deny, #6 Affidavit By Dahai Huang In Support of Defendant's Motion to Deny, #7 Affidavit By Xibin Huang In Support of Defendant's Motion to Deny, #8 Affidavit By Xiqing Huang In Support of Defendant's Motion to Deny).(Borges, Deborah)
February 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 OPPOSITION BRIEF to preliminary injunction (Mumuyu). Document filed by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A hereto. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A).(Fairchild, Steven)
February 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 24 OPPOSITION BRIEF to preliminary injunction (Monsterking). Document filed by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A hereto. (Attachments: #1 Errata Exhibit A).(Fairchild, Steven)
February 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 OPPOSITION BRIEF to preliminary injunction (JRSmart). Document filed by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A hereto. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A).(Fairchild, Steven)
February 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 FIRST OPPOSITION BRIEF to preliminary injunction. Document filed by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A hereto. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B).(Fairchild, Steven)
February 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Steven Royal Fairchild on behalf of The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A hereto..(Fairchild, Steven)
February 16, 2022 Opinion or Order >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #19 MOTION for Deborah Borges to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
February 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 SECOND LETTER addressed to Judge Lewis J. Liman from Christopher Tom dated February 15, 2022 re: Seven (7) Day Extension Request. Document filed by Roku Inc...(Tom, Christopher)
February 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MOTION for Deborah Borges to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A hereto. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit in Support of Motion re: Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit Georgia Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Exhibit DC Certificate of Good Standing, #4 Text of Proposed Order).(Borges, Deborah)
February 15, 2022 Opinion or Order >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. #18 MOTION for Deborah Borges to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): missing Certificate of Good Standing from Washington DC;. Re-file the motion as a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order.. (aea)
February 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Deborah Borges to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A hereto. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit in Support of Motion re: Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Affidavit in Support of Motion Pro Hac Vice, #3 Exhibit exhibit 2 to Affidavit in Support of Motion Pro Hac Vice, #4 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order).(Borges, Deborah) Modified on 2/15/2022 (aea).
February 14, 2022 Opinion or Order >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. #17 MOTION for Deborah A. Borges to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-25724332. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): missing Certificate of Good Standing from Washington DC; missing Proposed Order. Re-file the motion as a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order. (aea)
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Deborah A. Borges to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-25724332. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Occopa Direct. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Notarized Affidavit for Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit GA Certificate of Good Standing).(Borges, Deborah) Modified on 2/14/2022 (aea).
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting #15 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. NOW THEREFORE, the Court orders that the TRO be extended for an additional fourteen (14) days, until March 1, 2022. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' deadline to oppose Plaintiff's application for a preliminary injunction is extended to Thursday, February 17, 2022. The preliminary injunction hearing previously scheduled for February 14, 2022, is adjourned to February 22, 2022 at 4:00 p.m. Plaintiff is ordered to serve a copy of this Order on Defendants. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motion at Dkt. No. 15. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 2/9/2022) (tg)
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Set/Reset Deadlines: ( Show Cause Response due by 2/17/2022.), Set/Reset Hearings:( Show Cause Hearing set for 2/22/2022 at 04:00 PM before Judge Lewis J. Liman.) (tg)
February 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time addressed to Judge Lewis J. Liman from Christopher Tom dated 02/08/2022. Document filed by Roku Inc...(Tom, Christopher)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER: Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, Plaintiff's Application is hereby GRANTED, except with regard to Defendant 1, as to whom the application is DENIED without prejudice for failure to provide sufficient evidence of the alleged infringement, and it is ORDERED as follows: 1. As sufficient causes has been shown, Defendants are temporarily enjoined and restrained from engaging in any of the following conduct pending the return date of the Application as referenced below: a. Using the ROKU Trademarks or any other marks substantially identical or confusingly similar to the ROKU Trademarks in connection with the distribution, marketing, advertising, offering for sale, or sale of any Counterfeit Products, as further set forth herein. 2. Within five (5) days of receipt of this Order, the Marketplace Platforms are directed to: a. disable and cease providing services for any User Accounts through which Defendants engage in the sale of Counterfeit Products, including any User Accounts associated with the Defendants listed on Schedule A to the Complaint (which is also attached hereto) with the exception of Defendant 1, and for the remaining Defendants, only insofar as the accounts relate to the Defendants'infringing listings and offering for sale and/or sale of Counterfeit Products; b. disable and cease displaying any advertisements used by or associated with Defendants in connection with the sale of Counterfeit Products, as further set forth herein. 3. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 64 and 65, as well as C.P.L.R. 6201, and this Court's inherent equitable power to issue provisional remedies ancillary to its authority to provide final equitable relief, as sufficient cause has been shown, that within five (5) days of receipt service of this Order, that (i) Contextlogic, Inc. ("Wish"), (ii) PayPal, Inc. ("PayPal"), (iii) Payoneer, Inc. ("Payoneer"), (iv) the Alibaba Group d/b/a Alibaba.com and Aliexpress.com ("Alibaba"), (v) Amazon Payment Systems, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. ("Amazon"), (vi) Ping Pong Global Solutions, Inc. ("Ping Pong"), (vii) eBay, Inc. ("eBay"), (viii) Coinbase Global, Inc. ("Coinbase"), (ix) LianLian Global t/as LL Pay U.S., LLC ("LianLian"), (x) AllPay Limited ("AllPay"), (xi) Union Mobile Financial Technology Co., Ltd ("Union Mobile"), (xii) World First UK Ltd. ("World First"), (xiii) Paxful, Inc. ("Paxful"), (xiv) and other payment processing service providers (collectively referred to as the "Financial Institutions") shall locate all accounts associated with Defendants (the "Defendants Accounts") and other assets belonging to Defendants, including any cryptocurrency (the "Defendants' Assets") and shall locate, attach, and restrain the transfer or disposing of monies or funds from Defendants' Accounts, as well as the transfer or disposing of Defendants' Assets, until further ordered by this Court. The Financial Institutions shall provide written confirmation of their compliance with the foregoing to Plaintiffs' counsel. 4. As sufficient cause has been shown, Plaintiff may serve subpoenas on the Financial Institutions to identify any and all of Defendants' Financial Accounts, and provide Plaintiff's counsel with a report containing account details for any and all such accounts, which shall include, as further set forth herein. 5. As sufficient cause has been shown, Plaintiff may serve subpoenas on the Third Party Service Providers to identify any and all of Defendants' User Accounts and Merchant Storefronts, and provide Plaintiff's counsel with a report containing account details for any and all User Accounts and Merchant Storefronts, which shall include, as further set forth herein. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3), as sufficient cause has been shown, that service of this Order and the Summons and Complaint may be made on, and shall be deemed effective as to Defendants if it is completed by either of the following means, as further set forth herein. Such alternative service by electronic means ordered herein shall be made within five (5) days of the Financial Institutions compliance with Paragraphs 3 and 4 of this Order. 7. The Clerk of Court is directed to issue a single original summons in the name of "THE INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES, PARTNERSHIPS, AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A TO THE COMPLAINT" that shall apply to all Defendants. 8. Plaintiff shall deposit with the Court Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00), either cash, cashier's check or surety bond, as security, which amount was determined adequate for the payment of such damages as any person may be entitled to recover as a result of a wrongful restraint hereunder. 10. Schedule A to the Complaint and Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Karina Levitian shall remain sealed until Defendants' financial accounts and assets are restrained. 11. Plaintiff shall file unsealed versions of Schedule A to the Complaint and Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Karina Levitian using the CM/ECF system prior to the expiration of this Order. 12. Any Defendants that are subject to this Order may appear and move to dissolve or modify the Order on two (2) days' notice to Plaintiff or on shorter notice as set by this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a hearing shall be held on February 14, 2022 at 12:00p.m. which Plaintiff may present its arguments in support of its request for issuance of a preliminary injunction, including as to why any broader restraints on or transfers of Defendants' User Accounts and Merchant Storefronts than ordered herein may be necessary or justified. At such time, any Defendants may also be heard as to opposition to Plaintiff's Application. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that opposing papers, if any, shall be filed and served on or before February 10, 2022, at 5:00 p.m. This Temporary Restraining Order without notice is entered on February 1, 2022, and shall remain in effect for fourteen (14) days. Show Cause Hearing set for 2/14/2022 at 12:00 PM before Judge Lewis J. Liman. Show Cause Response due by 2/10/2022. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 2/1/2022) (vfr) Transmission to Civil Case Openings Clerk for processing. Transmission to Finance Unit (Cashiers) for processing.
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Christopher Tom on behalf of Roku Inc...(Tom, Christopher)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ***EX-PARTE***REDACTION to #8 Declaration in Support , Exhibit 2 by Roku Inc. (Attachments: #1 Def 2, #2 Def 3, #3 Def 4, #4 Def 5, #5 Def 6, #6 Def 7, #7 Def 8, #8 Def 9, #9 Def 10, #10 Def 11, #11 Def 12, #12 Def 13, #13 Def 14, #14 Def 15, #15 Def 16, #16 Def 17, #17 Def 18, #18 Def 19, #19 Def 20, #20 Def 21, #21 Def 22, #22 Def 23, #23 Def 24, #24 Def 25, #25 Def 26, #26 Def 27, #27 Def 28, #28 Def 29, #29 Def 30, #30 Def 31, #31 Def 32, #32 Def 33, #33 Def 34, #34 Def 35, #35 Def 36, #36 Def 37, #37 Def 38, #38 Def 39, #39 Def 40, #40 Def 41, #41 Def 42, #42 Def 43, #43 Def 44, #44 Def 45, #45 Def 46, #46 Def 47, #47 Def 48, #48 Def 49, #49 Def 50, #50 Def 51, #51 Def 52, #52 Def 53, #53 Def 54, #54 Def 55, #55 Def 56, #56 Def 57, #57 Def 58, #58 Def 59, #59 Def 60, #60 Def 61, #61 Def 62, #62 Def 63, #63 Def 64, #64 Def 65, #65 Def 66, #66 Def 67, #67 Def 68, #68 Def 69, #69 Def 70, #70 Def 71, #71 Def 72, #72 Def 73, #73 Def 74, #74 Def 75, #75 Def 76, #76 Def 77, #77 Def 78, #78 Def 79, #79 Def 80, #80 Def 81, #81 Def 82, #82 Def 83, #83 Def 84, #84 Def 85, #85 Def 86, #86 Def 87, #87 Def 88, #88 Def 89, #89 Def 90, #90 Def 91, #91 Def 92, #92 Def 93, #93 Def 94, #94 Def 95, #95 Def 96, #96 Def 97, #97 Def 98, #98 Def 99, #99 Def 100, #100 Def 101, #101 Def 102, #102 Def 103, #103 Def 104, #104 Def 105, #105 Def 106, #106 Def 107, #107 Def 108, #108 Def 109, #109 Def 110, #110 Def 111, #111 Def 112, #112 Def 113, #113 Def 114, #114 Def 115, #115 Def 116, #116 Def 117, #117 Def 118, #118 Def 119, #119 Def 120, #120 Def 121, #121 Def 122, #122 Def 123, #123 Def 124, #124 Def 125)Motion or Order to File Under Seal: #9 .(Yellin, Michael)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 1116, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following trademark(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)..(pc)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ***EX-PARTE***REDACTION to #1 Complaint, Schedule A by Roku Inc.Motion or Order to File Under Seal: #9 .(Yellin, Michael)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION to Seal Schedule A to Complaint and Exhibit 2 to Levitian Declaration. Document filed by Roku Inc...(Yellin, Michael)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 DECLARATION of Karina Levitian in Support re: #5 Proposed Order to Show Cause With Emergency Relief. Document filed by Roku Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (Trademark Registrations)).(Yellin, Michael)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 DECLARATION of Michael R. Yellin in Support re: #5 Proposed Order to Show Cause With Emergency Relief. Document filed by Roku Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (January 2011 Mark Monitor report), #2 Exhibit 2 (IP Rights Seizures Statistics Report), #3 Exhibit 3 (BASCAP Report), #4 Exhibit 4 (ICANN Registrar Accreditation Agreement), #5 Exhibit 5 (Hague Convention on Service Abroad), #6 Exhibit 6 (Translation of Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China)).(Yellin, Michael)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #5 Proposed Order to Show Cause With Emergency Relief . Document filed by Roku Inc...(Yellin, Michael)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PROPOSED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WITH EMERGENCY RELIEF. Document filed by Roku Inc.. Related Document Number: #1 ..(Yellin, Michael) Proposed Order to Show Cause to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review..(Yellin, Michael)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Roku Inc...(Yellin, Michael)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Yellin, Michael)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A hereto. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25663516)Document filed by Roku Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (Trademark Registrations)).(Yellin, Michael)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING PROPOSED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WITH EMERGENCY RELIEF. Document No. #5 Proposed Order to Show Cause With Emergency Relief was reviewed and approved as to form. (dt)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Case Designated ECF. (pc)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Lewis J. Liman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roku Inc. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A hereto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roku Inc.
Represented By: Christopher Tom
Represented By: Michael R. Yellin
Represented By: Harry J Moren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A hereto
Represented By: Deborah A. Borges, I
Represented By: Steven Royal Fairchild
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Occopa Direct
Represented By: Deborah A. Borges, I
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ENWShop (8)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: XL GAMES (41)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: eStarpro (10)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fancer (13)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JRSMART (18)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Moose Store (29)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mumuyu (30)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MonsterKing (27)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?