8904 5TH Ave LLC v. MJ Engineering & Design LLC
| 8904 5TH AVE LLC |
| MJ ENGINEERING & DESIGN LLC |
| 1:2022cv00858 |
| February 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Mary Kay Vyskocil |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 nr Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN. Document filed by 8904 5TH Ave LLC. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Joint Letter).(Glanzberg, Jack) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: The conference will be held telephonically. To join the conference, dial 888-278-0296 and enter access code 5195844. Initial Conference set for 4/5/2022 at 11:30 AM before Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 2/22/2022) (tg) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND. Document filed by MJ Engineering & Design LLC..(Pollack, David) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #7 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Executed Stipulation extending MJ Engineering & Design LLC's Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint., #1 Notice of Removal,. As such, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's request is GRANTED. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before February 22, 2022. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate docket entry 7. SO ORDERED. MJ Engineering & Design LLC answer due 2/22/2022. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 2/17/2022) (tg)
|
| Filing 8 BRIEF re: #6 Order to Show Cause, Affirmation in Response to Order to Show Cause. Document filed by MJ Engineering & Design LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Emails, #2 Exhibit B - Youssef Affidavit, #3 Exhibit B-1 - Youssef Drivers License, #4 Exhibit C - Andrawes Affidavit, #5 Exhibit C-1 - Andrawes Drivers License).(Pollack, David) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Executed Stipulation extending MJ Engineering & Design LLC's Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Document filed by MJ Engineering & Design LLC..(Pollack, David) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants are directed to show cause by February 16, 2022 why this case should not be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Flemming v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, No. 21 Civ. 1112, 2021 WL 878558, at *1-2 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 9, 2021). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 2/2/2022) (tg)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jack Glanzberg on behalf of 8904 5TH Ave LLC..(Glanzberg, Jack) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Matthew Steven Aboulafia on behalf of 8904 5TH Ave LLC..(Aboulafia, Matthew) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney David M. Pollack. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: MJ ENGINEERING & DESIGN LLC. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name was entered in all caps. (vf) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by MJ ENGINEERING & DESIGN LLC..(Pollack, David) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Pollack, David) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from NY Supreme Court, County of New York. Case Number: 150054/2022. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25666062).Document filed by MJ Engineering & Design LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Summons & Complaint).(Pollack, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: 8904 5TH Ave LLC v. MJ Engineering & Design LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: 8904 5TH AVE LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jack Glanzberg |
| Represented By: | Matthew Steven Aboulafia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MJ ENGINEERING & DESIGN LLC | |
| Represented By: | David M. Pollack |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
