Seidman v. The Howard Hughes Corporation
Plaintiff: Helayne Seidman
Defendant: The Howard Hughes Corporation
Case Number: 1:2022cv00884
Filed: February 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Gregory H Woods
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i): Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff and/or plaintiff's counsel, hereby give notice that whereas no party is an infant or incompetent the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff has voluntarily dismissed this case under F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1) (A)(i). The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 3/31/2022) (rro)
March 31, 2022 Filing 10 AO 121 FORM COPYRIGHT - CASE TERMINATED- SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 17 U.S.C. 508, the Register of Copyrights is hereby advised that a final decision was rendered on 3/30/2022 in a court action filed on the following copyright(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Form e-mailed to Register of Copyrights. (tp) (Main Document 10 replaced on 3/31/2022) (tp).
March 30, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) The Howard Hughes Corporation. Document filed by Helayne Seidman. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Sanders, Craig)
February 8, 2022 Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. The Howard Hughes Corporation served on 2/4/2022, answer due 2/25/2022. Service was accepted by Jane Doe; Legal Representative of CSC. Document filed by Helayne Seidman..(Sanders, Craig)
February 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: DUE DATE OF JOINT LETTER and PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN: April 5, 2022. DATE AND TIME OF CONFERENCE: April 12, 2022 at 1:00 p.m. The conference will be conducted by telephone. The parties are directed to the Court's Emergency Rules in Light of COVID-19, which are available on the Court's website, for the dial-in number and other relevant instructions. The parties are specifically directed to comply with Rule 2(C) of the Court's Emergency Rules. SO ORDERED. (Telephone Conference set for 4/12/2022 at 01:00 PM before Judge Gregory H. Woods. Initial Conference set for 4/12/2022 at 01:00 PM before Judge Gregory H. Woods.) (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 2/3/2022) (mml)
February 3, 2022 Filing 6 AO 121 FORM COPYRIGHT - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 17 U.S.C. 508, the Register of Copyrights is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following copyright(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Form e-mailed to Register of Copyrights. (vf)
February 3, 2022 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to The Howard Hughes Corporation. (vf)
February 3, 2022 Case Designated ECF. (vf)
February 3, 2022 Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf)
February 3, 2022 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Gregory H. Woods. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf)
February 2, 2022 Filing 4 AO 121 FORM COPYRIGHT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 121 Form Copyright for case opening submitted to court for review..(Sanders, Craig)
February 2, 2022 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to The Howard Hughes Corporation, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Helayne Seidman..(Sanders, Craig)
February 2, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Sanders, Craig)
February 2, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Howard Hughes Corporation. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25672502)Document filed by Helayne Seidman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2).(Sanders, Craig)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Seidman v. The Howard Hughes Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Helayne Seidman
Represented By: Craig B. Sanders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Howard Hughes Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?