Reiss v. Baron et al
| Karolina Anna Reiss |
| Elena Baron and Denise M. Dominguez |
| 1:2022cv00908 |
| February 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
CIVIL JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this action is dismissed. The Court dismisses Plaintiff's claims under 42 U.S.C. 1983 under the doctrine of judicial immunity and as frivolous. The Court declines to consider, under its supplemental jurisdiction, any of Plaintiff's claims under state law. See 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(3). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/3/2022) (Attachments: #1 Pro Se Appeal Package) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court dismisses this action. The Court dismisses Plaintiff's claims under 42 U.S.C. 1983 under the doctrine of judicial immunity and as frivolous. The Court declines to consider, under its supplemental jurisdiction, any of Plaintiffs claims under state law. See 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(3). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Court directs the Clerk of Court to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/3/2022) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Mailed a copy of #4 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint), #3 Order of Dismissal, and Notice of Appeal Instructions to Karolina Anna Reiss at 20 River Terrace, Apt. 25C, New York, NY 10282. (kh) |
| Pro Se Payment of Fee Processed: Check $402.00 processed by the Finance Department on 2/18/2022, Receipt Number 465401294076. (jcf) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEES OR IFP APPLICATION: Plaintiff is directed to render payment of the fees to bring this action or submit an IFP application to this Court's Pro Se Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).Fees due by 3/21/2022. In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Application due by 3/21/2022. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on February 17, 2022) (Attachments: #1 IFP application) (jjg) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Mailed a copy of #2 Order Directing Payment of Fee or IFP Application to Karolina Anna Reiss at 20 River Terrace, Apt. 25C, New York, NY 10282. (kh) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(bcu) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Elena Baron, Denise M. Dominguez. Document filed by Karolina Anna Reiss. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
